Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009
     
    Can I get some information about the guru JG Siddhaswarupananda Paramahamsa. If you know something about him please tell me. My friend is intent on finding his followers and becoming one himself. There seems to be little about him online. Discussions both positive and negative seems to have stopped. Is he still alive. Let me know what you know.
    •  
      CommentAuthorVEDA
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009
     
    A yoga teacher who joined ISKCON together with his disciples for some time and then split. He has several sites and is mentioned in some discussions here, usually under "Haribols".
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009
     
    Where did they split to? Are they a deviation from the Gaudiya Sampradaya? If so what are the deviations?
    •  
      CommentAuthorccd
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009
     
    It was not a 'deviation' as such, it is a schism. We call them a 'splinter group'.
    •  
      CommentAuthorportnoy
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009
     
    Siddhaswarupananda Maharaja (Chris Butler) eventually left ISKCON, went back to Hawaii, formed a new organization called "Science of Identity" -- got married -- and lives a reclusive life in a very posh home in Hawaii. Many of the folks who were originally his followers and disciples from before he joined ISKCON in the early 70's are back with him and they also have expanded with centers mainly in Hawaii, Australia and the Phillipines. His Disciples refer to him as "Jagat Guru" as well as "Prabhupada." Among his loyal followers in Hawaii Siddhaswarup has some influential and controversial disciples such as Mike Gabbard, a local politician.

    The above should be enough info for "googling" one's way right up to Siddhaswarup's door -- but don't expect to be invited in. He has body guards and a security system at his enclave.
    •  
      CommentAuthorportnoy
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009
     
    Here is their official website:

    http://www.scienceofidentity.org/
    •  
      CommentAuthorVEDA
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009 edited
     
    Once I visited their program in Prague. Two Polish followers, one Czech translator and about six visitors, myself included.
    The main thing is they want to avoid being confused with ISKCON. Therefore they didn't wear dhoti but business suits, no sikhas but regular hair, not playing traditional instruments but guitar, no mahamantra but mantra(?) "nitai gaur haribol, haribol nitai gaur". The philosophy itself wasn't deviated. At the end they distributed prasadam oranges. In summary, nothing specifically attractive although chanting Holy Names should be appreciated. Otoh, our acaryas don't like manufactured mantras.
    • CommentAuthorKyros
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009
     
    That's enough to be considered a deviation.
    •  
      CommentAuthorportnoy
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009
     
    D V A Shun
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009
     
    My friend says his followers say Srila Prabhupada endorsed his branch and recognized him as a 'pure devotee'.. I don't have access to the folio. Please post anything that endorses or poo poos him by Srila Prabhupada.
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009
     
    BTW. I emailed at their site but no one responds to my questions. I wanted to know where their temples are. They must have a Sunday program. Anyone know?
    • CommentAuthorradhav
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2009
     
    Try
    there is a reasonbale size congregation in sacramento area

    http://www.lotusgardenmeditation.org/
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 9th 2009
     
    Do they have any actual temples?
    •  
      CommentAuthorVEDA
    • CommentTimeDec 9th 2009
     
    Regarding Siddhasvarupananda, these things which you have heard are simply rumor and there is no substance. Siddhasvarupa does not want to take disciples, neither he should have disciples while I am alive. That is the process. I have never said that Siddhasvarupa is a pure devotee.* That is simply concoction. Now I am going to India in few weeks and I shall stop at Hawaii and take Siddhasvarupananda to India for training him up properly.
    Hoping this meets you in good health,
    Your ever well-wisher,
    A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami
    *But every one can become a pure devotee if he has no other desire than to serve Krsna and the Spiritual Master.
    (letter to Sudevi, LA 15 Sept 1972)

    All of my disciples are pure devotees. Anyone sincerely serving the spiritual master is a pure devotee, it may be Siddhasvarupa or others, a-Siddhasvarupa. This must be very clearly stated. It is not only that your Siddhasvarupa is a pure devotee and not others. Do not try to make a faction. Siddhasvarupa is a good soul. But others should not be misled. (letter to Tusta Krsna, Ahmedabad 14 Dec 1972)
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 9th 2009
     
    Ouch! My gosh. Those are really clear words. How is it so many accept that he is a 'Paramahamsa'?
    •  
      CommentAuthorVEDA
    • CommentTimeDec 9th 2009
     
    Who can stop you from using any label? But that doesn't mean it's factual, that one really has uttama adhikari characteristics. Even more people accept this title in case of Ramakrsna... How it can be a matter of number of followers?
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 9th 2009
     
    Are there any online forums I can talk directly to his followers? All the websites I found are the same, quite generic but no forums or real interaction. How does one meet him? Where does he stay? There must be some access to him.
    •  
      CommentAuthorccd
    • CommentTimeDec 9th 2009
     
    No online forums, it is against the strategy adopted by him. Complete privacy in many ways.
    •  
      CommentAuthorccd
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2009 edited
     
    Imagination sri_govinda_das -- Urmila did go ahead and visited their temples a few years back, like in 2003, they are doing well and expanding in their areas, do not know about NZ (why would anyone go that far;-).
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2009
     
    By the looks of their center in Sacramento it does not appear that they have gone away. It looks a little new agey though. Anyway I don’t want to be too judgemental, as I don’t know much about them. If they are chanting the Holy Names they must be on the right track???
  1.  
    Over the years I have met several of Siddhasvarupananda's disciples and found them to be very nice people. I went on harinam with them once in Poland and they were chanting Hare Krsna (that was around year 2000). They de-emphasize the external things like wearing dhotis or saris, and have a less strict approach to the 4 regulative principles. Other than the practical points, their theology is just like ours.
    •  
      CommentAuthorportnoy
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2009
     
    When you write "their theology is just like ours" --- what do you mean by "ours" ???? The pronoun "ours" implies you and others so the "you" part is clear enough -- but who are the others in "ours?"
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2009
     
    I think he is talking about the Sampradaya. My freind got the scoop on what happened years ago with the devotees blowing themselves up. According to the Haribolers Jagad Guru told them it was not a good idea to employ violence they should just chant the Holy Name. But they went against the instruction, the result being they blew themselves up.

    Srila Prabhupada said he was not a 'pure devotee' but that was decades ago. Apparently he kept on his way and is now recognized by many as a bona-fide acharya. If anyone can show me some actual deviations from the philosophy I might be convinced he is not authorized. Otherwise I can't see discouraging anyone from hearing or trying to get his association as hard as that might be.
    •  
      CommentAuthorccd
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009
     
    > american nonsense of women sitting on vyasasans to preach to men....

    He he... it gives you away.
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009
     
    Pranams and excuse me Sri Govinda Das Prabhu, I don’t know so many things. You must at least be to the level of madyama devotee so please be compassionate to a kanista like myself Thank you for informing me of my spiritual status and my desire to be cheated. So far no one has given me such status. Now I know that at least I am some kind of a Vaishnava. Thank you very much. I will do my best to improve from this point.

    I asked for some information on how the group or how the leader in particular deviated.

    1. Please be kind enough to clarify what part of ISKCON Jagad Guru has gone in the opposite direction. Many have gone in the opposite direction. Please be more specific and detailed on what he chose to do the opposite of.

    2. If J.G. is a bonafide guru then it is his perquisite concerning the number of rounds he gives his followers. Some in the Gaudiya Math claim Srila Prabhupada deviated. It is a kanistha mentality to argue over such details. According to Siddhanta the number of rounds given falls into the category of a detail that may change according to time place and circumstance. Therefore if he gives less rounds that could not be considered a deviation from the sampradaya. A bonafide acharya never changes any ABSOLUTE truths. However he MAY change many details. He may change many things according to his own mood. The mood of Srila Prabhupada was quite different than that of his guru. He changed quite a lot of details. The same argument you are using on this one can be used against Srila Prabhupada.


    3. Please explain to me what Srila Prabhupadas mood of “devotees and demons” is and how they deviated that way. Maybe you have something here.



    4. You say he initiated within the presence of Srila Prabhupada. That would surely be a deviation. But in the letter above Srila Prabhpada says, “Regarding Siddhasvarupananda, these things which you have heard are simply rumor and there is no substance. Siddhasvarupa does not want to take disciples..” If you have more evidence that in fact he did initiate disciples please let us see it. That would constitute a deviation. But Srila Prabhupada says he was not initiating and that was just a rumor. Please give us the proof.

    5. How is a shaved head and carrying a danda a must to be a follower of Srila Prabhupada? George Harrison got plenty of people chanting but no shaved head or danda. Gaura Kisora Das Babaji and many leaders prior to him did not carry a danda or waterpot. In fact the practice had disappeared until the advent of Sarasvati Thakur. Again some say the greata Thakur deviated by bringing back sannyasa. I don't think you have anything on this one.

    6. What women sits on the Vyasasana? That would be a deviation.

    I look forward to some concrete evidence of deviation if it exists and thanks for taking the time to help me.
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009
     
    correction... question six is supposed to end with a question mark..

    6. What women sits on the Vyasasana? That would be a deviation?
  2.  
    >What women sits on the Vyasasana? That would be a deviation?

    Why that would be a deviation?
    •  
      CommentAuthorportnoy
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009
     
    .they are not part of our sampradaya.Otherwise he should wear dhoti and tilaka,carry a danda and ....shave the head....ect.But he always thought he new better......He merely wants the prestige of being a guru connected to Srila AC Bhaktivedanta swami.....However he does not do as his guru has done....just changing.....exploiting ...this is the ''american disease''.

    The above quote by sri govinda das describes Hrdayananda so I suppose according to him Hrdayananda is a changing and exploiting diseased imposter. Then why is he sanctioned by ISKCON's GBC to continue acting as a sannyasi and initiating guru? If you criticize and condemn Siddhaswarup on these charges then you have to apply the same standards to Hrdayananda and others who are in positions of influence and leadership. No?
    •  
      CommentAuthorccd
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009
     
    Actually modern day ISKCON is much closer to Siddha's group then it was way back when. Certainly not everyone here can say that every ISKCON man shaves the head and lives in the temple. Hey they would even select a GbC man knowing they do not follow some of the regs. That should say something.
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2009
     
    I understand, that just like our ISKCON, they teach the Jiva Fell from the pastimes of the Lord. They are the only other group in the world who teaches like that. All the other Sampradayas, the Gaudiya Math etc. do not teach like that. I also understand that just like our ISKCON they frown on anyone seeking help outside the institution. In other words siksa is only allowed within thier Science of Identity Institute. It seems they are way closer to our standard than any others. Aside from the externals. I also know for a fact some devotees chant some of those mantras Jagad Guru made up, even at Sunday programs in ISKCON. I just don't like it when the pot calls the kettle black.
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2009
     
    So he fell down from Sannyasa and married a disciple. Certainly that is a deviation. That he watered down the process is another deviation. That he never actually surrendered to Srila Prabhupada is another.

    Why doesn’t any of our leaders challenge these charlatans! Instead they turn a blind eye. Another big Gaudiya Math Guru who took at least 1,000 of our devotees and turned them against ISKCON is being courted by our leaders!!! They grovel at his feet!!!! That guru brings the most intimate pastimes of Krishna into the open and now devotees who can’t even control sex desire think they are qualified for Gopi Bhava!!!

    So sometimes I wonder if our own leaders are any better than a Siddhaswarup. Excuse me for the offense if it is one.
    Thankful People: maah!
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2009
     
    """This is a rough appreciation of the actual event however after my christmas marathon service Bhakta Rodney prabhu....i will be able to supply sufficent detail once i am back home with my own library and my own extensive computer devotional histories."""


    I would very much appreciate that. These things should be verified for the future.
  3.  
    I know the Haribolers "Gurukulis" run a animation series called Ninjai and also a video series called Karmakula
    http://www.ninjai.com/

    They did not appreciate me pointing out the similarities of their cartoon to Vedic/Krishna culture. In the cartoon the boy vegetarian ninja, Ninjai, offers his food to God. He talks about Karma. He is looking for a guy named Maha. On one episode he stops his heart by meditation and prayer and taken to a place where he meets this Maha. On the way he passes a temple that looks exactly like the Jagannatha temple. The logo as you will immediately notice is Hanuman. Also before each cartoon he states "Who am I, Where did I come from?" (Prayers of Brahma?) They run a nice discussion group on their site but don't like it if anyone points out that cartoon is specifically Krishna related they will kick you out.
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2009
     
    If Ninjai passes the temple of Jagannatha and then meets this Maha I think that could not be Krishna he met. Sounds like somebodies fertile brain (imagination). Sounds like they are making it up as they go, using Vedic knowledge to achieve some success in the cartoon world but not wanting to give credit where it should be given.
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2009
     
    and if they kick the Vaishnavas off the forum for being honest I consider that offensive.
    •  
      CommentAuthorVEDA
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2009
     
    > if anyone points out that cartoon is specifically Krishna related they will kick you out.

    You can point it out on other forums (like imdb), if you want.

    Rodney: This type of hidden inspiration is quite common in the movie industry. But kicking someone out sounds off.
    • CommentAuthorHaridas
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
     
    portnoy:Here is their official website: http://www.scienceofidentity.org/
    I invite anybody to check the section 'religious fanaticism'. What an absolute load of nonsense. How anybody can suggest this man is anything but a cheater is beyond me. Where did the money for his big house come from?
    • CommentAuthorHaridas
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
     
    Rodney:and if they kick the Vaishnavas off the forum for being honest I consider that offensive.
    Is it because they're a bunch of oddballs who follow 'some guy'? How dare you offend Guru Dave!
    •  
      CommentAuthorccd
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
     
    > How dare you offend Guru Dave!

    Are you talking about Nrsimha-Dave who is in England and who knows that your broke some instruments in Brighton temple?
    Thankful People: Haridas
  4.  
    You should check out this section: http://www.scienceofidentity.org/about_jagad_guru
    where Siddha clearly identifies himself as as Vaishnava and proclaims himself to be a "humble disciple of this greatest of scholars and devotee in modern times (Srila Prabhupada)". I have no idea why some of you guys see him as a charlatan and deviant. Srila Prabhupada never rejected him as a disciple. He has his own preaching strategy but to me the only question is: "Is it effective?" Does it turn people into devotees of Krsna? From my personal experience with his disciples, the answer is "yes". The rest is between him, his guru, and Krsna.
    •  
      CommentAuthorccd
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
     
    >Is it effective?

    According to Urmila they are very successful, its expanding and yes people become devotees. Who said he was a charlatan? He is a schism, so is Trippurari Sw etc but schisms are often are very successful.
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
     
    Like different branches of the same tree?

    If he is bona-fide why do people say he is a charlatan? Does that mean if they say that, THEY must be the charlatans? Cause if that is true you have to through out a great percentage of ISKCON gurus. Why did Srila Prabhupada say he is not a pure devotee?
    Whay did Srila Prabhupada ask him not to make a faction? if he is so bonafide?
    • CommentAuthorRodney
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2009
     
    Kula Pavana and ccd,

    Are you saying we should discount the fact he gave up sannyasa and married a disciple? Because if we accept that he is a bona-fide acharya we must accept his behavior is correct.

    My friend tells me he gave up sannyasa because it 'got in the way' of his preaching!!! Sannyasa was instituted for the sole purpose of preaching!!! But now it is a hindrance???

    So you think an acharya can give up sannyasa huh????
  5.  
    Rodney: Are you saying we should discount the fact he gave up sannyasa and married a disciple? Because if we accept that he is a bona-fide acharya we must accept his behavior is correct. My friend tells me he gave up sannyasa because it 'got in the way' of his preaching!!! Sannyasa was instituted for the sole purpose of preaching!!! But now it is a hindrance??? So you think an acharya can give up sannyasa huh????
    In my view he is a guru, not some great acharya in the traditional Gaudiya sense. But who knows, maybe he will be one some day? ---------------- Some 90% of those who got sannyasa from Prabhupada fell down from their vows, with many falling rather badly and leaving Krsna consciousness. Giving sannyasa to young westerners was a bad idea, and SP himself admitted as much, proclaiming in 1977 that there is to be no more sannyasa in his movement, suggesting that they all get married. Here some quotes: ----------------------- Srila Prabhupada Conversation, January 7, 1977, Bombay: Prabhupada: "If you talk in the modern society they will laugh: "What nonsense this man is... 'By sex life one becomes conditioned.' " They cannot understand. Hare Krsna... (japa) This should be strictly outlawed, no more sannyasis. And those sannyasis who have fallen, you get them married, live like a... No more this showbottle, cheating. It is very ludicrous. Even there is a promise that "We shall not fall down again," that is also not believable. What is the use? Better go and speak philosophy in your grhastha dress, not this dress, but you have nice coat, pants, gentleman. Who says no? I never said. Rather I shall be glad to see that up-to-date gentlemen with tilaka and sikha are speaking. That is very prestigious everywhere…" ---------------------------------- "And this kind of hypocrisy--they have taken sannyasa and mixing with woman. This is not to be allowed. If you want woman you get yourself married, live respectfully. We have no objection. But this hypocrisy should be stopped. There have been so many fallen down. First of all there will be no sannyasi anymore. I have got very bad experience." (Room Conversation, 7th January, 1977)
    •  
      CommentAuthorccd
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2009 edited
     
    Rodney:Kula Pavana and ccd, Are you saying we should discount the fact he gave up sannyasa and married a disciple?
    That is not even a fall down. Prabhupada encouraged some of his sannyasis to get married (Rupanuga and Pusta Krishna) and married himself Bali mardana (some GV fanatics did not like it;-) Rasikananda and others in our line gave it up, so that is not a reason to reject a person, we have ISKCON gurus who marry a disciple (RSd). That just does not seem to be a problem unless you are a fanatic.
    •  
      CommentAuthorccd
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2009
     
    Rodney: So you think an acharya can give up sannyasa huh????
    Don't know if he is an acharya;-) but Nityananda, Rasikananda, Shyamananda gave up nyasa and got married. They are acharyas. We should be careful about accusing sannyasis who got married. Some of them are very nice souls and are welcomed by Prabhupada.
    •  
      CommentAuthorVEDA
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2009
     
    Can you give refs that Nityananda, Rasikananda and Shyamananda were sannyasis?

    Nityananda Prabhu maintained Himself as a brahmacari; He never took sannyasa. CC 1.5.149 p., also CC 2.3.85 p.
    •  
      CommentAuthorccd
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2009 edited
     
    They were mendicants (nyasi) or bhiksu (for Nityananda see (CB Adi. 9. 134, CB Madhya 3. 78 CB Madhya 13.15-19) and not in the service of a guru (brahmacaria). I am aware that BR Sridhara Swami (and his followers based on purports of BBST on CC) disprove that Nityananda was sannyasi. But Prabhupada used it as an example to Rupanuga and others. I don't know if all these nitya-siddhas they took ekadanda and certainly none of them were tri-dandi bhiksu (what we call sannyasa in ISKCON and Gaudiya Math). Neither did Sri Jiva, Rupa, Krisnadasa Kaviraja or Raghunatha dasa Goswamis took this kind or type of sannyasa but they all were mendicants living on donations or traveling (and not in the care of a guru, like a brahmacari). There are some indications that Sanatana did take it but then became a what we today call a babaji later. The issue is that renuciation is not of an essence but is supportive to bhakti. BTW Chotta Haridas was not a sannyasi, Haridas is not a sannyasi name (nor is chotta ;-).
    •  
      CommentAuthorVEDA
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2009
     
    I meant formal sannyas. They were more like babajis.
    •  
      CommentAuthorccd
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2009
     
    VEDA:I meant formal sannyas. They were more like babajis.
    You are right -- formal sannyas is not really part of our sampradaya that we have until BSST for en exception for a couple of cross pollination cases. But even then, it became part of daivi-varnasrama preaching of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura -- best brahmana-sannyasi is the model human being being a Vaisnava. You see once there is claim that a person is beyond VA -- it is hard to argue except for calling them sahajiyas;-) but I hardly imagine that Siddhasvarupa is a sahajiya, Prabhupada never indicated that he was even after he got married -- but certainly we should check with his wife first=)
 
Powered By ISKCON Tech