We have upgraded Pariprashnena! Login is done with email OR username + usual password now. Any problem or doubt please email pariprashnena@gmail.com
Is there anything the user VEDA does not know?
  • CC Madhya-lila 24.313
    Lord Siva said:
    "I know the meaning of the Bhagavat and I know that Sukadeva and VEDA know it also.
    But for Vyasadeva, he may or may not know it.
    The Bhagavat can only be known through bhakti, not by mundane intelligence or by reading many commentaries."

    :)
  • OK, here is a question to VEDA, who was the spiritual master of Sandipani Muni?
    That one my son is always joking with me that i do not know.
  • Abhiramji, don't create fake sastra quotes. ;)

    Caballero Vaishnava: "A description of Sandipani Muni is found in the Srimad Bhagavatam (10.45.31-48) and in the Visnu Purana (5.21.19-30)." (Caitanya Bhagavata 1.8.26 commentary, Pundarika Vidyanidhi das edition - in Vedabase)

    Try Visnu Purana. I don't have it complete, just an abbreviated version. Mahabharata Sabha Parva, Chapter 38 is another possible source but I couldn't locate any mention of Sandipani in my Ganguly edition.
  • Here's one for you VEDA (should you choose to accept). This is from a recent dialogue between Kurma Prabhu (cookbooks) and me:

    Hare Krishna!


    > once an Indian devotee told me a story about one muni who performed a
    > fire sacrifice that was to result in a calf getting a new body. at
    > some point during the yajna his wife desired to eat the flesh of the
    > sacred animal so she secretly hid a piece in her asrama.
    >

    > when they were chanting the mantras to put the calf back together in a
    > new body the wife became scared and threw the piece into a nearby
    > field. Since the mantras were spoken the flesh regenerated separately
    > from the cow and thus formed garlic, onions, carrots and red lentils.

    > I've searched google and asked devotees for a sastric reference but to
    > no avail. have you ever heard of this story before?

    Vaguely rings a bell. I suggest you write to:

    (Bhakta) Jan Mares (NE-BBT Czech) (his pamho address)

    He's a vedic scholar and if it's Vedic, he will have heard of it.

    Let me know what he says.

    ys

    k
  • This story is circulating around ISKCON but no one seems to know the reference. Possibly some Purana but I couldn't locate it.

    Similar story, from Puranic Encylopedia by Vettam Mani (under CANDRA VI.):

    Solar eclipse according to the Puranas. The Devas and the asuras jointly
    churned Ksirabdhi wherefrom emerged Dhanvantari with the Amrtakumbha (pot of
    nectar). (See Amrtam).

    But an asura mayavi (magician) called Saimhikeya absconded to Patala with
    the Amrtakumbha which nobody noticed as everybody was busy with dividing
    other divine objects. Only after the mayavi's disappearance was it noticed
    that the Amrtakumbha was missing. At once Mahavisnu assumed the figure of a
    beautiful woman, got back the Kumbha and gave it to the devas. The devas
    began drinking the amrta when, at the instance of some other devas,
    Saimhikeya, the mayavi, assuming the form of an old Brahmin reached svarga,
    got a share of the amrta and began to drink it. Surya and Candra (Sun and
    Moon) who were on guard at the gates divined the secret of the 'old Brahmin'
    and informed Mahavisnu about it. He cut the throat of the pseudo-Brahmin
    with his Sudarsana Cakra. But, half of the nectar he had drunk stayed above
    the throat and the other half below it. Therefore, though the head and the
    trunk were severed they remained alive. These two parts, in course of time,
    evolved as Rahu and Ketu.

    When the throat was cut some blood as well as some amrta dropped on two
    places on the ground, and they became the red onion and the white onion
    respectively. Some vaidika brahmins used to consider the red onion
    objectionable for consumption as it was evolved from blood, while the white
    onion was considered usable as it was evolved from amrtam.

    Rahu and Ketu still maintain their hatred for Surya and Candra who had
    betrayed the asura, who, disguised as brahmin tried to drink the amrta.
    Eclipse is the phenomenon of Rahu and Ketu swallowing Surya and Candra as
    and when opportunity presents itself for it. But, since the throat is
    severed from the body, Surya and Candra thus swallowed get out through the
    throat. That is the reason why Surya and Candra become visible after the
    eclipse in over. (Kamba Ramayana, Yuddha Kanda and Bhagavata, Astama
    Skandha).

    Note: Kamba Ramayana is a Tamil text by poet Kambar. It differs from Valmiki Ramayana and shouldn't be considered as good as recognized sastras. And no, I'm similar to Vedic scholars only by having one head, two hands and two legs like most of them do. ;) I just have some resources on my fingertips.
  • Cool :D So there is nothing VEDA doesn't know.
  • That's what I thought. :)
  • He certainly doesn't know what he does not know.
  • Greetings, Veda.


    A while back we were talking about the non-scriptural problematic arguments that some people struggle with in their spiritual life, and you said you were compiling them along with Vedic counterarguments.

    May I ask how that project is going?

    Thank you.
  • Reading that stuff was contaminating my consciousness so I lost inspiration to continue.

    Here's a short analysis of a deconversion story: http://www.veda.harekrsna.cz/library/Lauri_Davi.zip
  • VEDA:
    Reading that stuff was contaminating my consciousness so I lost inspiration to continue.


    :)

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion