yes, that's mahaprabhu's order for every bona fide vaisnava to become a guru - siksa, diksa, whatever. and generally, every vaisnava can. the disciple approaches the prospective guru, and if both are satisfied that the other is qualified, they accept each other.
according to vaisnava-etiquette one doesn't accept disciples while one's own guru is still present; obviously a vaisnava would feel that his guru is more qualified than himself to be a guru.
in a 'math,' the acarya decides how things are done, including who initiates and who doesn't. ISKCON isn't a math, and the closest we have to an acarya is the GBC. from the 1975 GBC meetings:
Resolved: The GBC (Governing Body Commission) has been established by His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada to represent Him in carrying out the responsibility of managing the International Society for Krishna Consciousness of which He is the Founder-Acarya and supreme authority. ...
that doesn't spell out that the GBC is to appoint gurus, but it's included in the job-description. the other alternative would be to not regulate guruship at all: anybody who feels like can accept disciples. sometimes i thought this might be a better option, but in the end i came to the conclusion it won't. there are too many people with inflated egos around, and too many people who don't know enough to discriminate. in the end ISKCON and the GBC would be blamed, anyway, because they are the final authority, for allowing such things to happen.
some regulation should be there, some minimum-standard that those who want to accept disciples have to fulfill. obviously they can't look into anybody's heart and really know what the person will or won't do during the next 50 years. the present system is awkward, and perhaps a better one can be found, but the principle, that the GBC decides who's going to initiate, is ok, IMO.
phani:where is the job description where this is included?that doesn't spell out that the GBC is to appoint gurus, but it's included in the job-description.
govindas108:One must die and take birth again or become twice born! According to my understanding,brahman initiation means to reject all sinful way of living[the sinful personality dies!],and a new personality with brahmanic qualities is born,[second birth] by regular practice of sadhana,and obeying the orders of his bonafide spiritual master,who succeeded to go back to Godhead,by following his spiritual master's orders. Anyone who can't follow the orders of the Founder Acarya strictly,can't really deliver his disciples completely!Do you have any sastric pramana, preferably from Bhagavatam/sruti/smriti or pancaratra to the above. I will add it to my collection of extreme instructions.
ccd:I hope you've understood my quote:I don't mean one should die physically,but one's sinful personality has to "die" meaning one should never commit sinful activities again.It's actually the formal vow that all devotees take upon receiving initiation,confirmed by brahman initiation.Look also in Nectar of Devotion ,ch one,verse one.govindas108:One must die and take birth again or become twice born! According to my understanding,brahman initiation means to reject all sinful way of living[the sinful personality dies!],and a new personality with brahmanic qualities is born,[second birth] by regular practice of sadhana,and obeying the orders of his bonafide spiritual master,who succeeded to go back to Godhead,by following his spiritual master's orders. Anyone who can't follow the orders of the Founder Acarya strictly,can't really deliver his disciples completely!Do you have any sastric pramana, preferably from Bhagavatam/sruti/smriti or pancaratra to the above. I will add it to my collection of extreme instructions.
1 to 17 of 17