So next time you get sick you were meant to get sick and you should not go to a doctor. Otherwise you would get better automatically.amalagaura:
Yes we should spend our time on spiritual goals, and maybe doing a past life regression will help people. Unless you are following Shrila Prabhupada's instructions fully and are taking sannyasa at the next Gaura Purnima festival, then I will not suggest bothering with past life regression.
But you are qualified to tell what is beneficial and what is not for all the aspiring Vaishnavas out there?
amalagaura:
It is a common piece of Vaishnava etiquette to not give advice unless you are asked for it. You may only give advice to your disciples and other dependents. So quite frankly your opinions may be valid and I hope they are good for the people you are guiding.
Tell me exactly where Srila Prabhupada says we should spend our time trying figure out what or who we were in our past lives. I need the exact quote. Quite possibly you will find the opposite.
Another common fallacy with past-life regression is the inexplicable gap between the present life and the last incarnation. For example, the subject who thought she was Bridey Murphy claimed to have died in 1864 in her last life, leaving a sixty-year period before her "next incarnation" as Virginia Tighe. The book indicates that during this period the soul of Bridey Murphy lived in the "spiritual world."
According to the principle of reincarnation taught in the Vedas, we learn that this is quite impossible. The actual process of reincarnation is that the soul, after leaving a material body at death, enters another womb in some species of life in this or another universe, as directed by the immutable laws of karma and arranged by material nature.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!