We have upgraded Pariprashnena! Login is done with email OR username + usual password now. Any problem or doubt please email pariprashnena@gmail.com
How can one give long term support to serious criminals and still become a GBC or guru?
  • Hare Krishna, my name is Deenanath dasa, from Perth Australia. Sorry I haven't put a photo or bio info yet, but will do shortly once I figure it how to.

    I'll take up the mantle and put up this question, framed as I understand it. (I've been following skc's comments. I know him and guess he is not likely to give out his identity, a tactic which doesn't do him any favours. You could say I'm doing this on his behalf, but not really because I would also like to hear others thoughts on this question.

    ys
    deena
  • deena: you and skc have the same ip: 202.72.153.151, so probably are the same person.
    we are disabling your old username, please use your new id.
    Next time you do some trick we will ban your ip all together.
    Go ahead with your question.
  • Hare Krishna Deenanathji, hope you're doing well.

    Imho, this question must be answered by those devotees (who supported crimes and criminals) by closely looking into their hearts and reforming their old ways. If that happened and others still criticize them, it is spiritually dangerous for the critics. But if they persist in their old ways as seen by their current actions, they are not credible.
  • I'd say if they recognize publicly making that mistake, they will be no problem. Doubts can come if they still revere those criminals.
  • If they publicly admit the mistake, then I see no probs. Problem would come if they still revere those criminals.
  • I can understand how reforming your ways and publicly admiting the mistake can help, but to then become a guru? It just seems like a big step to me. I could understand if someone has reformed and then keeps a reasonably low profile humbly executing devotional service, but to be a 'pin-up' guru (sorry, couldn't find the right word) just doesn't sit right with me. Or am I being too pessimistic about human nature?

    By the way, skc is really me. I am reformed, publically admiting my error.
  • In my view, if we sort of decide who is guru, we are making the same mistake as the GBC. Taking a guru is like marrying, you can inform me that girl is not suitable for me or for anybody but you cannot force that view on me. And at the end it's ME who is gonna live with the girl and reap the results (if you were right). Moreover, that mistake is probably a (necessary) stepping stone towards perfection. If we try to institutionalize the figure of guru, then GBC is going to do it, naturally. Get my point?
  • I can understand the principles that Veda and Mishra state, i.e reforming, publically admiting. (I was recently reading the Manu-samhita stating that part of the punishment for one who kills a brahmana is that for the next 12 years he must tell everyone he meets that he has killed a brahamana.) It appears to me that there are some grey areas where individual cases and circumstances should be considered, and this is where it becomes difficult because there is currently an unwritten social taboo on openly discussing names and details. A further difficulty in navigating this issue is that one often has no choice other than to accept a 'definitive' conclusion on a particular case from a person/body with a vested interest, a conclusion that no court of law can accept due to 'conflict of interest' laws.

    I agree that you cannot force an opinion on who is a guru on someone, not even Krishna does that. But he does give copious instructions on standards of behaviour and qualifications required of a guru.

    Another way to view the question would be like this: If someone, as a devotee, gave proactive long term support to serious criminals even to the point of leaving Iskcon, what qualifications would they have to have or demonstrate before they become eligible to be a guru or GBC in Iskcon?
  • Apart from clearing oneself before the Law, needs a public crystal clear written statement of repulse to those criminal activities and their possible support, conscious or unconscious. That will suffice to me. But even that is usually NOT happening, covered by vested interests as you say. What is the fear? To make the holy aura around the person disappear? They should not fear that if the person is really humble and with no ulterior motivation.
  • amazing how in a society that is supposed to be promoting the absolute truth - the truth can sometimes be so hard to come by
  • PARIPRASHNENA IS A WASTE OF TIME
  • In my opinion prabhu, those who support criminals are themselves criminals. Otherwise why support? This is a huge problem that plagues our once revered society. The current criminals have taken the place of the former criminals. Due to their previous support, they themselves have become criminal. Therefore, there is no attraction there. We don't witness people flocking to the temples anymore. One has to ask himself the question as to why this is, and answer in all honesty. Your servant, Priya
  • I have just read on Hansadutas site: Ramanujacharya engaged dacoits for collection, then had them killed. Madhvacharya pummeled his opponents...

    Funny to hear it coming from him... if you know what I mean, guns and roses for Krsna I mean.

    Okay I will tell you another story. Mayapur temple was often attacked by one local gang. Prabhupada asked to see the gang leader. after a talk, the gang leader joined. He was the TP for a long time.
  • Good one Bubba. Yes, but only Srila Prabhupada could do such a thing. Otherwise it is out of the realm of our capicity. We are not pure devotees like Prabhupada.Your servant, Priya
  • Priya:
    We are not pure devotees like Prabhupada.Your servant, Priya
    Nobody is like Prabhupada. But I'm sure sitapati have the same capacity.. Even more I guess, as he can post on this forum and Prabhupada can not.
  • Please provide an example. Not to minimize anything about sitapati, who I am sure is very advanced. But, what makes you so certain that he possess the purity and spiritual prowess to pull off such a thing. Humbly, your servant, Priya
  • Going back to the theme, I can see a lot of distrust caused by the fact that some of the new key leaders in ISKCON were at one point loyal to Kirtanananda or even initiated by him, etc
    The issue is not going to go away, I think a written declaration by those personalities explaining their mistakes and present understanding coming from experience would silence all this turmoil.
    Trying to sweep it under the carpet could seem the best, but it WILL backfire at one point or another. Did not we learned from the past yet? Better to be valiant, straightforward and clear all misunderstandings.
    And, yes I do consider them innocent or misguided in principle, but at the same time I do need some clarification.
  • It is not in principal that they committed some pretty heavy offenses. They actually did it. Therefore, where is the innocence prabhu? Admission at this point in time is beyond conception. It simply won't happen. It didn't happen then, what would make the perpetrators admit it now? In any event, I do not wish to spend too much time on this matter. To me, it's so old, it's dead. And I think it detrimental to my spiritual well being to dwell on it. If I continue in this way I will become like Janmastami prabhu. I made my comment and will certainly go into further. However, it is not my favorite subject matter. Your servant,
    Priya
  • Priya:
    Please provide an example. Not to minimize anything about sitapati, who I am sure is very advanced. But, what makes you so certain that he possess the purity and spiritual prowess to pull off such a thing. Humbly, your servant, Priya


    I hope that will answer the question. According to our philo, ie Caitanya-vaisnava siddhanta, jiva, ie any jiva, is not acuyta. All jivas have the same capacity of attainment of krsna-prema. Also no criminal act, birth or mistake can contaminate a jiva, that includes Keith also know as Kirtanananda. Of course I agree with you Priya Prabhu.

    Whenever we like we should quote sastras, whenever we do not like, we just refer to the common sense or even better an emotional one. So anyone who was told by Prabhupada to support certain devotees, should revise this instruction, because they are convicted criminals, even if its against our siddhanta.
  • With all due respect prabhu, you are comparing apples to oranges. Taking repeated birth and death is certainly proof of criminality. And of-course this is not a disqualification regarding the orders of Mahaprabhu. However, we must in my opinion, take an honest stand on the issue. Let's call the spade, a spade. Why do you guys always quote satsra in an attempt to justify the actions of the perpetrators. And if you honestly believe what you say, than why are these people not accepted back into the society? viz Hansadutta, Kirtananada and so on and so forth. Hypocrisy. Otherwise those individuals would be welcomed back into the society. They are not. Therefore, what is the point of quoting "our philosophy." If you don't follow it? YS, Priya
  • It might be a dead issue for you Priya Mataji, but in my opinion it is quite a live issue. The reason I say this is because the institutional dynamics and personalities that allowed these perpetrators to occupy topmost positions of spiritual authority, are the very same institutional dynamics and personalities that guide our society today.
  • Firstly, I assure you, I am no Mataji deena prabhu. Priya is only a portion of my actual spiritual name. In any event, I respect your opinion. However, based on my personal experience regarding this matter, you are wasting your precious time debating over this issue. Krsna is the controller This is all Krsna's arrangement. As soon as Srila Prabhupada left the planet, actually just prior to that, "our society" had become, or was on the way to becoming something other than Srila Prabhupada's ISKCON. That's why "our society" today should be rejected. It is not what is was intended to be. Therefore, it is to be rejected. This is most unfortunate for the sincere, as we are left with no choice except to reject them and "their society". We want no part of it. If we take any role of involvement with them, we to become implicated in the their continuing offenses. I am not one who wishes to be in that position. Therefore, the temple and all it's functions are available to me in my home. I worship Srila Prabhupada and the Gaura Nitai deities that reside in my home. Prabhupada's books are there. Everything is there. I have no need or desire to associate with the perpetrators and their associates. Krsna consciousness begins at home. Believe it or not, it's absolutely true. Therefore, why should one waste his time trying to do something which is beyond his capacity or control. You are not the doer. No matter what you say, write, publish or attempt to do in the hopes of rectification, it simply will not work. Krsna is the doer. Not us. After all these years and all of our failed attempts at rectification, through forming different camps, writing, publishing so many different things, some of us are still trying to fight a battle we just can win. At least for now anyway. So, we just continue with our spiritual business at home and continue to sharpen our swords. That's all we can really do. We are not the controllers. When Krsna sees fit for the sincere ones to take over, better be prepared Bubba, because we're going to battle. I personally would like to see it go down in that way, but it may not. Whatever Krsna wants we will accept. For now, better to simply stay away from them and wait. No arguing, no pontificating, nothing. Just take care of your spiritual business and wait to see what happens. In the mean time, try to help the sincere ones who are somehow trapped in "their society". Krsna will reveal His plan in due course. I completely understand your frustration prabhu. It's like a warrior sitting in his hut sharpening his sword. He can't do it for very long, because of his fighting spirit he must fight. So, sometimes we channel that fighting energy into this futile arguing because we have no battles to fight. That's alright on occasion, or when the need arises. However, we should not make it our soul engagement. After all that the like minded persons have attempted to do in the hopes of change. Nothing has changed. In fact, it's only gotten worse. So how much more proof do you need that we are not the doer's? You can't change Krsna's plans, it's way beyond your capacity. As it is for all of us. Therefore, better to chant Hare Krsna and wait to see what takes place. All of this is futile. Sincerely, Priya
  • Priya:
    Why do you guys always quote satsra in an attempt to justify the actions of the perpetrators. And if you honestly believe what you say, than why are these people not accepted back into the society? viz Hansadutta, Kirtananada and so on and so forth. Hypocrisy. Otherwise those individuals would be welcomed back into the society. They are not. Therefore, what is the point of quoting "our philosophy." If you don't follow it? YS, Priya


    Sastra yoni vat.

    According to current GBC position (e.g. HDG) anyone who claims to be in ISKCON is an a member. So everyone is welcomed back, just as it was in Prabhupadas days. So who does not follow what? I do not understand the whole notion of excluding anyone, restricting yes, but not excluding or depriving, that's against the basics of compassion.
  • I agree with ccd, restricting levels of participation is required in some cases, not exclusion. Iskcon is for the most fallen and that's us.

    The point of the question is to understand the reasoning/dynamics behind an apparent lack of any restriction on people who have shown extended pro-active support for a known criminal and peadophile.
  • I think the point is "Are they still supporting those nut heads criminals? If so, then they should be restricted too. Simple.
    (and I mean for that, special respect for them, "explanations" or cover ups for their criminal activities, etc).
    Talk and express yourselves loud and clear, my dear ex- nutswami followers so to clear our doubts. Otherwise it is all cloudy and that doesn't help.
  • Q is: How can one give long term support to serious criminals and still become a GBC or guru?
    Answer is one has to provide support to all. Some restrictions can be placed on criminals again to support them and others ie that their relationship will not harm others who need ever greater support, eg innocent, women, children. I see this question as being aimed directly on RNS and other few swamis from NV. I think they are not to blame. Really. Prabhupada strongly supported KS in his position even after quite a few serious deviations, how can we blame SPs disciples for following KS then?
  • I sincerely say that still a clarification on their part will clear out many minds (mine being one). Don't you think?
  • mishra:
    I sincerely say that still a clarification on their part will clear out many minds (mine being one). Don't you think?
    Yes, any clarification is always good.
  • Bubaji, I regret to inform you, but you are in illusion. I know these guys personally and stiil maintain contact with one or two of them. Trust me, It is NOT as it was in "Prabhupada days". Your DEAD WRONG! I will personally conatct a couple of these people that you claim are welcomed back into Iskcon and have them spell it out for you. You mentioned Hansadutta prabhu. Ask him if he is welcomed back. Ask Kirtanananda.They are not. Kirtanananda can't even come within so many feet of the property in NV. So please do not proceed to claim understanding regarding this particular matter, when you obviously have none. Most unfortunate for you both. (ccd & deena) YS, Priya
  • I was referring to a clarification from the present leaders ex-followers of KS.
  • They will take the truth to their graves. It will never see the light of day, I assure you. I speak to Hansadutta on a daily basis, and I spoke with Kitanananda not too long ago. Still, neither of them are allowed anywhere near the temples. Kirtanananda, I can see, but not Hansadutta. He never touched any children. As far as clarification from the followers of K, like Radhanatha and Kuladri, they are guilty as sin. But you will NEVER hear this from them. NEVER! Yes, it would be nice to hear them admit their previous misdeeds. But you won't. They have too much material prosperity to lose. Kuladri is a paid employee of Iskcon for his so-called service at NV. (PAID) And Radhanatha is too wrapped up in himself to give up the worship he receives from his most unfortunate disciples. You people better get on the ball. When the battle I am hoping for ensues, you may be on the wrong side. If it doesn't OK, but you'll still be on the wrong side. At this point, based on your responses, for lack of a better term, and please forgive me, you guys are just pissing in the wind. You have no real knowledge of the situation at hand. It's all speculative and based on second and third hand information. Want to know the truth? Contact Hansadutta. Contact Kirtanananda. They will give you the real deal. I have to be quite honest here, I was actually hoping, prior to my speaking on this site, that at least some of you came to grips with this. But, unfortunately you have not. May Prabhupada and Krsna bless you in your spiritual endeavors. YS, Priya
  • see if I understand, KS and Hamsadutta are the victims and the followers are guilty?
    I though KS is the indisputable offender and the subject of this thread is to know if some of his followers somehow are guilty by association or conspiracy.
    What is KS version anyway? Seems like nobody knows it but you and a few other.
  • Priya:
    Bubaji, I regret to inform you, but you are in illusion. I know these guys personally and stiil maintain contact with one or two of them. Trust me, It is NOT as it was in "Prabhupada days". Your DEAD WRONG! I will personally conatct a couple of these people that you claim are welcomed back into Iskcon and have them spell it out for you. You mentioned Hansadutta prabhu. Ask him if he is welcomed back. Ask Kirtanananda.They are not. Kirtanananda can't even come within so many feet of the property in NV. So please do not proceed to claim understanding regarding this particular matter, when you obviously have none. Most unfortunate for you both. (ccd & deena) YS, Priya

    This has nothing to do and does not answer the question.
  • Mishra prabhu, yes that is correct. Only those who were in close association with K know the truth. Janmastami speaks the truth regarding this matter. Because he was there, as was I. However, I will not go into deatils! Next issue: I never said victims. A comment was made that today's Iskcon is as it was in "Prabhupada days". I am simply trying to enlighten you by my statements. Those days are long gone. If you choose not to believe, that is your choice, as well as your misfortune. This has everything to do with, and does answer the question. Unless of-course you have some other question. You said, they are welcomed back in like back in "Prabhupada days".. Well I say they are not. They say they are not. Once again Bubba, your choice. Remain in illusion, or accept the facts. I was there! Janmastami was there! We know what really happened. When Radhanatha and Kuladri would see either one of us after the fact, they would run and hide in fear of being exposed by us. Janmastami has apparently made this his life's work. I chose another route. As far what K's version is all about, I honestly don't know. He's too busy clinging to the handful of foolish followers he has somehow maintained. He will NEVER admit! Whereas Hansadutta has admitted. So, at least Hansadutta can admit his mistakes. But still, he is not welcome. More than anything, these people we are speaking of fear exposure more than anything else. They will and have gone to great lengths to keep it as secret as possible. Claiming that Jan is simply crazy. But, they can't say that about me because I didn't go public with the info. I thought, what would be the spiritual benefit. Either to me or anyone else for that matter. There is none. Everyone knew enough to reject K. Therefore, I took a back seat to the matter and remained silent. To this day, I refuse to go into detail. It has no spiritually beneficial qualities. So, why partake? To possibly gain some notoriety, or get my fifteen minutes. NO! Prabhupada would not approve of such activity. I personally have been approached by many who know, to write a book regarding this matter. I refused for the above mentioned reasons. I hold true to that. I will not go into detail! However, I will state that Jan is telling the truth regarding this. I simply don't approve of his continuation of it. It's counter productive to our KC. Please, let us end this conversation. It is not good. What is the value??? YS, Priya
  • One last comment on this issue. Why perpetuate the nonsense activities of the past? What is the value? If someone could give me a valid spiritually beneficial reason for exposing the truth. I will give up all the tapes. Until then, just know that Janmastami speaks the truth. He's just really upset about the whole thing, more-so than myself. You must try and understand, we were willing to give up our lives for the cause, and then we got, and please pardon me, pissed on. So, Jan's version is the real one. He just went a little bullistic with it in my opinion. His vision may have become somewhat distorted by dwelling on this. However, that does not constitute invalidation. It's all unfortunately TRUE. Do with this info as you please. I can only hope that you guy's accept it and then leave it be. At least for now. YS,Priya
  • So we dont repeat the mistakes that where made in the past,like NEW child abuse in Ireland and MORE Gurus falling down.
  • Hariharibol prabhu, First and foremost, they are NOT Guru's. Only in the minds of themselves and their foolish followers. You know as well as I do that they are simply legends in their own distorted minds. They posses have no real shakti. Never did, never will. Only because they superseed Srila Prabhupada. And therfore lost the mery. Along with that mercy was Prabhupada's shakti. But because they thought themselves equal to or even better than Srila Prabhupada, they have NOTHING! That's the very reason why the society is in this present state. Fallen Guru's is a contradiction of terms. Guru does not fall down! In any event, I am not aware of the situation in Ireland. It is most unfortunate. However, as I stated previously, they will get what they deserve in due course. Of this, there is NO DOUBT. Now maybe some of you out there can understand why we want war. This stuff just goes on and on and on. The so-called authorities have done and will continue to do nothing regarding this matter. They simply continue to try and vail themselves by claiming to help these kids, yet as we have all seen, they didn't and don't, and won't. Let us wait Bubba. Be patient. Hare Krsna!
  • I'm quite sure now that almost all of the last posts completely ignore the topic at hand. Question is why?
  • Why is not the original question. Why what?
  • I understand Priya what you are saying and I made up my mind sometime ago a little like you describe. Krishna is in control and I can't do anything about it, so why waste time. But at the same time there is a part in me that wanted to know the truth and the wise decision after that is to concentrate our poor kali-yuga already damaged energy in our individual KC and the preaching.

    ccd: It is all about the question, but the question is put in first person and at the end it is individual choice.
    I do not have any problem if you want to advance your cause, probably like Janmasthami Prabhu has done and I understand your quest. But the most powerful thing we can do to clean our movement right now, all being said as it has been said and all information out is probably just that, getting the info out there so that we do not permit the same to occur again. As for the gurus and authorities, we cannot check and shouldn't check people from choosing them. After all it is voluntary and everyone will ripe the fruit of their actions, correct or mistaken. What does that have really to do with our individual spiritual lives?
  • I have given you the truth Bubba. What you choose to do with it is strictly your business. It is most unfortunate that we have nothing else to discuss here. I have come forward, and not intentionally, and have done so in all honesty. I have confirmed Janmastami's claims. Like I said, in my opinion, he went a little to far. And trust me when I say, that this is an understatement to say the least. However, the truth is what it is, like it or not. Janmastami has spoken the truth regarding this particular subject matter. It was not my intention to get into this, but somehow or other I am right in the middle of it. Jan has spoken the truth. There you have it prabhu. Now you can continue with concentrating on your own KC. Is this not sufficient? And ccd, are we now going to critisize grammer. Give me a break.
    Advance my cause? My only interest is to advance by the means of the prescription given by OUR spiritual master Srila Prabhupada. Nothing more! I came to this site to possibly lend some assistance to those who need it. And they are many. This is rapidly turning into a free for all. Furthermore, yes they should be checked! They need guidance. It is your duty as an elder to give it. So, let us focus on that. To remain silent regarding the taking of a bogus guru is not the right thing to do. If we can present Srila Prabhupada to them in the hopes that they get it. Than let us do so. Where is the harm? It is to our benefit to do so ccd.
    Futhermore, ccd prabhu, it is beyond our control to attempt to prevent these events from taking place again. You are not the doer! We can certainly try to the best of our ability, but it still remains out of our control. Is it not?
  • Advance my cause? My only interest is to advance by the means of the prescription given by OUR spiritual master Srila Prabhupada. Nothing more! I came to this site to possibly lend some assistance to those who need it. And they are many. This is rapidly turning into a free for all. Furthermore, yes they should be checked! They need guidance. It is your duty as an elder to give it. So, let us focus on that. To remain silent regarding the taking of a bogus guru is not the right thing to do. If we can present Srila Prabhupada to them in the hopes that they get it. Than let us do so. Where is the harm? It is to our benefit to do so ccd.
  • Futhermore, ccd prabhu, it is beyond our control to attempt to prevent these events from taking place again. You are not the doer! We can certainly try to the best of our ability, but it still remains out of our control. Is it not?
  • Let us return to the question shall we. deena prabhu or skc or whoever he is, posed this question obviously in an attempt to somehow find out what the qualifications are to get his guruship reinstated, or whatever his position was. "By the way, I'm skc and I am now reformed and am publicly admitting my error." Give me a break Bubba. He simply wants to continue with his previous position and wants to know how to get there. This is his question. Yet, no-one has answered it for him. Someone please tell him.
  • I think after 4 comments in a row by the same Vratagirl explaining somebody else's question people may loose interest, would you?
  • The same girl. Pretty funny. Obviously you are not following what has been said here. Get with the program Bubba. Then make you comment.
  • Please allow me to clarify. My Name is Priyavrata das.
  • ccd: Go fuck yourself. You are fool #1.
  • If only you had the balls to say that to my face.....
  • no other name calling or provocation will be tolerated by the 2 prabhus here. Please chill out and stick to the question at hand.
  • I didn't start this Bubba. I will chill. However, I will not tolerate the ravings of a neopyte or anyone else for that matter. So let's keep it civil.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion