mishra:do you think there is a problem anupatha, like it might not be authorized or one could get the wrong philosophical impression with the original BG? Is the revised one the only one to read, otherwise we could get confused? Why you insist brushing off the inquiry? Just curious.Why? Because as you surely know some "devotees" use this "CHANGED and EDITED Bhagavad-gita" arguments as support for their nonsense ideas, e.g. regarding legitimity of today's ISKCON gurus and GBC, and so on... I'm just saying the changes are insignificant and there's no need of excessive concentration on these superficialities. Above referred article http://jaganat.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/bhagavad-gita-changes/ is disrespectful to HH Jayadvaita Swami and I really don't like it's unhumble tone. The only viable path for us is finding things uniting devotees and supporting their faith. Articles like this do just the opposite.
GopalaGuru:As i said in my previous response, i want the Bhagavad-Gita Srila Prabhupada used in the many lectures he gave, read the article post above, and if nothing significant was changed, why change???Please, ask directly HH Jayadvaita Maharaja.
mishra:Imho, you are the one splitting parties with your comments here, Prabhu.It doesn't look like really humble opinion. But anyway, I'm sorry, if it is possible to understand my comments as splitting parties, it's really not my intention. The scandals are one thing. Everyone can fall down. It happens. We are in Kali-yuga and unfortunately it's understandable. Everything depends on personal responsibility of every individual. The other thing is how the scandals are pointed out and publicly squeezed out by some envious and disballanced persons. In many cases the original problem can be relatively small, but being publicly discussed and gossiped it grows large. This whistle blowing especially on internet is really misfortunate way of advertising. Mishra Prabhu, aren't you accidentally the blogger who published that article? By the photo it looks like that... http://jaganat.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/bhagavad-gita-changes/
abhiram:but it makes the ritviks angry doesnt it? :)Not everyone who disagrees with the book changes is ritvik. Nor is everyone who disagrees with other situations within iskcon always ritvik. Is that the only reason you like this version of the gita - because it makes someone angry? Then you are missing out and promoting it for the wrong reasons.
1 to 36 of 36