Lots of things used in yajnas and deity worship is obtained via voilence or related to it. We are note jainas, and we use what krsna likes. Read Bhagavad Gita, at least couple of chapters.

Just thinking more about it, we live in a society, obsessed with protection of animals and preventing animal cruelty, as well as endangered species. It is very possible to come across such question in our daily preaching. I personally preach a fair bit to people I meet online, and I would love to churn this topic and come up with a more satisfactory answer than CCD prabhu gave, something that will not sound so dismissive, if not defensive, and will provide people with a proper understanding of our position on this issue.

One way the question could be rephrased would be to ask why Krishna would want to be worshiped using this substance.

I asked this same inquiry of my siksa guru ,Tamala krishna goswami who replied that these particular animals whose body is blessed by their use in vedic sacrifice received a ''higher destination''.His example which i made inquiries into lead me to the mahabharat,where krishna cheats the Kaurava's when a particular bison type beast is offered to goddess kali on the wrong day.How ever yudhistira maharaja offers his bison on the proper occasion and time.This animal has to have unique physical markings,according to the sastra,by there offering to durga in her feature as the godess of war,she accepts and the animal receives direct promotion to the human species.There by receiving the benediction of higher authorities and in some cases krishna.

By the way krishna was intent that yudhistira's bison offering be accepted to goddess durga on the right occasion,when there was an eclipse of the sun and the moon and the proper time according to the sastra.This offering was actually for his empowered representatives.His isvara's...his demigod servants .

my understanding is that the animal sacrifices sanctioned in veda all require a _qualified brahmana_ to conduct them--otherwise it's just slaughter. i don't know who claims to be a qualified brahmana / vaisnava today, but i would certainly not go ahead and kill a musk dear in order to offer it's musk to krsna.

far as i know it doesn't say anywhere that musk _has_ to be offered to satisfy the lord. other ingredients and paraphernalia that don't require violence should do nicely.

Stiapati:"So our ideas of "absolutely no animal killing" are informed by Buddhist and Jainist traditions, which were reactions to excessive animal-killing, and are also a reaction to today's excessive animal killing."

CCD: "We are note jainas"

"With great alacrity the hunter began to run toward his spiritual master, but he could not fall down and offer obeisances because ants were running hither and thither around his feet. (CC madhya 24.270)

Seeing the ants, the hunter whisked them away with a piece of cloth. After thus clearing the ants from the ground, he fell down flat to offer his obeisances. (CC Madhya 24.271)

"Nārada Muni said, 'My dear hunter, such behavior is not at all astonishing. A man in devotional service is automatically nonviolent. He is the best of gentlemen. (CC Madhya 24.272)

"'O hunter, good qualities like nonviolence, which you have developed, are not very astonishing, for those engaged in the Lord's devotional service are never inclined to give pain to others because of envy.' (CC Madhya 24.273)

Further in the purport of verse 24.272 from Madhya Lila Srila Prabhupada writes:

"According to Nārada Muni and Vedic culture, animal-killers are not even gentlemen, to say nothing of being religious men. A religious person, a devotee of the Lord, must be nonviolent. Such is the nature of a religious person. It is contradictory to be violent and at the same time call oneself a religious person. Such hypocrisy is not approved by Nārada Muni and the disciplic succession."

Here we can see that Srila Prabhupada calls violence and religion to be contradictory and he does not finish by calling it contradiction, he even calls it hypocrisy.

I understand the principle that Lord Krsna's senses need to be satisfied and we need to offer him what he likes. But I could not find any quotes or refrences about musk being an integral part of deity worship or any refrences where it is said that Krsna likes to use musk.

About use of musk in ISKCON, I know only one incident. One Maharaja wrote an article in which he mentioned that he received a donation of natural musk from an indian businessman and he was using it for his deities. Apart from that I do not know if musk is used in ISKCON temples or not but it is offered to deities in traditional indian temples like Jagannatha Puri.

I am not trying to judge anyone neither my intention is to contradict anything, my purpose behind starting this thread is only to develop a deeper understanding of principles of devotional service and I am grateful to everyone for their contribution on this topic.

Hare Krishna
PAMHO

One can also note the quantum of killing of animals and men that went on during the great war called Mahabharata.
The chief consideration for what defines correct or incorrect action is - which action will please Krishna.
Sanatana Goswami fed his Deity with saltless chapatis.
Grand worship does not always mean more love - but can lead one closer to love.

Obtaining musk may even be overendeavor. Its expensive.

In a rare case like Deity Installation, I have heard it is sometimes used.

There is violence in all our actions. Breathing, walking, moving in a car etc. Even in cooking we kill insects with the fire.

To not sin is impossible.

However, we can purify all actions by offering it to Krishna.

This is why He says - sarva dharman parityajya......aham tvam sarva papebhyo......ma sucah.

ys
mpcd

suparna:

Sitapati:For renunciants "extreme" forms of non-violence are practiced, but Srila Prabhupada explained that Bhimasena ate meat.

Can anyone please provide references where did Srila Prabhupada mentioned that Bhimasena ate meat? Thanks.

That's Ksatriya Dharma. There's probably a reference in the Mahabharat.

Prabhupada: Yes. But not from the slaughterhouse. Those who are kshatriyas, they can, they're allowed sometimes to eat meat. It is understood Bhima, Bhima also eating sometimes meat. Bhima. Amongst the Pandavas, only Bhima. Not others. So if the kshatriyas, they want to eat meat, they can be allowed on particular occasions. But they must go to the forest and kill the animal. Not that for meat-eating regular slaughterhouses should be maintained. This is all nonsense, degradation. If you want to eat meat, you go to the forest. And the sudras, they also sometimes eat meat. Or the candalas.
(mw, 'Varnasrama college', March 14, 1974, Vrndavana)

This is the only ref I found. I don't have time to search thru Mbh.