We have upgraded Pariprashnena! Login is done with email OR username + usual password now. Any problem or doubt please email pariprashnena@gmail.com
What sampradaya?
  • sabe, eka guna dekhi tomara sampradaye
    satya-vigraha kari' isvare karaha niscaye

    The only qualification that I see in your sampradaya (Madhva) is that you accept the form of the Lord as truth.
    - CC Madhya 9.277

    So did Lord Caitanya belong to Madhva sampradaya? [edited out]
  • http://iskconstudies.org/iskcon-studies-journal-vol-one/tradition-and-dialogue-reflections-on-ravi-gupta%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98walking-a-theological-tightrope%e2%80%99/
  • Certainly not an easy question to answer.
  • A false contradiction?
    Sri Caitanya accepted a guru from an established sampradaya to give an example (BG 3.21-24), just like when He goes to school, etc.
    Bhaktivinoda Thakura says the four Vaisnava sampradayas are preparing the ground for Sri Caitanya. Their teachings are not complete but establish tenets used in His siddhanta.
    It's true that from the pov of acceptance Krsna as Bhagavan GV sampradaya is closer to Vallabha and Nimbarka.
    More about Madhva-GV affiliation: http://www.iskcon.com/icj/11/04-gupta.html
  • VEDA:

    It's true that from the pov of acceptance Krsna as Bhagavan GV sampradaya is closer to Vallabha and Nimbarka.
    More about Madhva-GV affiliation: http://www.iskcon.com/icj/11/04-gupta.html


    But Vallabha sampradaya appeared later, Rudra sampradaya at the time did not have Vallabha and only later when Vallabha was established invited him to take up the chair of the acharya of Rudra sampradaya. But that was later. [br][br]

    The above my link is a review of the link you posted;-)
  • But Vallabha sampradaya appeared later, Rudra sampradaya at the time did not have Vallabha and only later when Vallabha was established invited him to take up the chair of the acharya of Rudra sampradaya. But that was later.


    Thanks for correcting me.

    The above my link is a review of the link you posted;-)


    Yeah but the evidence is in RR's article, esp. notes 26,27.
  • Okay so the quote is:

    Indeed, since the time of Sri Caitanya himself, Caitanya Vaisnavas have affiliated themselves with the Madhva sampradaya. Parampara lists connecting Caitanya to Madhvacarya are found in several works from Orissa written during or just after the time of Mahaprabhu. These include Bhaktijnanabrahmayoga by Acyutananda Dasa (a close associate of Caitanya in Puri) and a list by Gopalaguru Gosvami, a disciple of Vakresvara Pandita. Outside of Orissa, the most significant claim to the Madhva connection is the parampara list given by Kavi Karnapura in his Gauraganoddesadipika, which is quoted in Visvanatha Cakravarti’s Gauraganatattvasvarupacandrika and in the Bhaktiratnakara. Lala Dasa’s Bhaktamala also supports the Caitanya-Madhva link. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that early writings of the Vallabha sampradaya also make mention of Madhavendra Puri as a Madhva sannyasi, even though they consider him to be part of their own sampradaya.
  • Actually our line is ultimately nourished by a siksa component more than diksa.Srila bhaktisiddanta saraswati Prabhupada refused to accept several of the diksa guru's within our sampradaya even though they initiated formally members.Hence the line is considered self evident in many ways ......your servant sri govinda das
  • sri_govinda_das:
    Srila bhaktisiddanta saraswati Prabhupada refused to accept several of the diksa guru's within our sampradaya even though they initiated formally members.

    When did he refuse whom and why. While I heard it from others I never heard it from him or in his books.
  • My dear ccd ,have you heard who the diksa guru of srila bhaktivinoda thakura was?Sri chaitanya mahaprabhu appeared in a dream and informed sat cid annada bhaktivinoda to him as his diksa guru.
  • Also if one was to inquirer into the unique history of gaurakisore das babaji,one might be surprised to find that his guru was one bhagavat das babaji who in turn was accepted by our jaganatha das babaji maharaj.But our parampara shows srila jaganatha das babaji,bhaktivinoda thakura and then gaurakisora das ,then his grace srila bhaktisiddhanta saraswati .......hence we are not a diksa line .....but siksa in nature and nourishment in my humble opinion.Please make your enquirers yourself.....hopefully my guru shared with me adquately .....Hint ....where does viphina das goswami appear?
  • sri_govinda_das:
    Also if one was to inquirer into the unique history of gaurakisore das babaji,one might be surprised to find that his guru was one bhagavat das babaji

    Was it? what I was trying to say is something different (obviously I am aware that Srila Gaurakisora das babaji Maharaja did not take babaji from Bhaktivinoda Thakura, and I am aware of who he took the diksa from (and it is not Bhagavat das Babaji Maharaja. The point I was making is that there no written record of ANY rejection of any vaisnava or diksa guru by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta sarasvati Thakura. This is why I made a point - where do you get ANY notion of rejection if he himself never rejected anyone? Making siksa or bhagavat or however you call line of teachers and publishing it is not a rejection. Just as if you say that your prime connection is to Srila Prabhupada, it does not mean you REJECT TKG. It is just that you have and worship your guru Srila Prabhupada on the altar as part of Bhagavata Parampara, while you gurudeva, even if not on the altar, is the person who gave you the transcendental name.

    [br][br]
    I find putting in print any notions of rejections of vaisnavas a form of sadhu-ninda, and would not want it attributed to Srila Bhaktisiddhanta sarasvati Thakura. Did he ever put it in print?
  • sri_govinda_das:
    My dear ccd ,have you heard who the diksa guru of srila bhaktivinoda thakura was?Sri chaitanya mahaprabhu appeared in a dream and informed sat cid annada bhaktivinoda to him as his diksa guru.

    Is it a story or something? It is not in any writings of Bhaktivinda Thakura, about him and not in his pranama mantra (written under supervision of BSST). gaura sakti svarupaya (gaura-of Lord Caitanya; sakti-energy; svarupaya-unto the personified) Which is the realization of BSST that BVT was a manifestation of Sri Gadadhara Prabhu, no mention that he got an 'initiation' from Mahaprabhu in the dream>>??>> Please let me know from what written source you get it, please. Is it someone else's imagination. BVT all his life worshiped his diksa guru.
  • My dear ccd mataji,please accept my kind regards,within gaudiya vaisnavism there are incredible differences of mood and siddhanta present.Maybe 8 - 10 years ago i went about trying to drag my humble devotional service into a proper philosophical light.Since i had stumbled along on automatic for a few years i felt necessary to enquire from my siksa guru about how to visualise and ascertain exactly how devotional credit or nourishment is transmitted from devotee to devotee.In my case i had the normal ''neophyte appreciation'' of what guru siddhanta means''diksa''.I get initiated serve my guru and it all stems and flows from him or her ...fullstop.
    However i had certain reservations about my simplistic perception,though adequate it failed to satisfy completely when your spiritual master passes or he infact falls down which was what had happened to me personally when my diksa guru Bhavanada prabhu fall down.
    Being a sankirtan devotee ,you find senior devotee association and ask?
    Guru tattva being in the books seems very grand and self sufficent however practically without senior devotees mercy you don't actually go any place.Personally i think krishna has intentional done this to make us beg ,to allow these extensive layers of arrogance to be peeled off our backs one at a time .
    Usually in an embarrassingly humble and humiliating way ,which usually allows one to eat sh**t when devotional humble pie is on the menu.In the old days the sanyasis used to yell at us very ,very loudly.....sometimes extremely aggressively..
    Any way my siksa guru ,his divine grace srila Tamala krishna goswami was in a very different mood .He seemed very alert,sweet,with a devilish look in his eye.After hearing that he had recently been ''pulled into line'',by some of his godbrothers i was really intrigued.He seemed more settled and well...... satisfied.
  • Well after a good class for all the assembled devotees in christchurch temple,tamala krishna goswami asked for questions......i garthered up all my courage and as usual dove straight in......up to my neck.Firstly i asked about how some devotees seem initiated even before accepting a diksa guru.....He smiled and replied that the initiating spiritual master was already present!.....Which was not at all the party line being preached by Iskcon .Then after several other questions by my godsister jambavati devi dasi .....I asked about his new mood !He had obviously transcended his previous manner ,mood and vision of the future.....he had drastically changed .He smiled a wonderful smile and asked me if i had a specific question.I asked him about our parampara line?Our line appeared not infact to be a diksa line.Which he confirmed but at once asked anyone within the room to turn off there tape recorders off because the GBC would not necessary like what he might infact say next to us.
    He commented that Guru was infact'' One'',he had recently taken shelter of senior vaisnava devotees within the gaudiya math....for a time he had experienced and tasted an interesting alternative but on the suggestion of his godbrothers had decided to return to the iskcon fold.Hence forth he would not be returning......Voluntarily relinguishing their asossiation due to encouragment from others within Iskcon.
  • That was the external conversation,however asking several questions i was able to form my own vision of what had infact happened.He mention a different mood than what iskcon was about at the time and this encouraged me signifigantly to search further.Basically his veiw was in summary that their was an a practical level of taking ones necessary encouragment,rasa,nourishment from those in our line who were uniquely qualified to instill in us that which was personally necessary for our individual needs.He was definitely saying it was a siksa line and not diksa,consequently several realisations had manifested along with new information and had given him increased vision and encouragment.Especially since he was a senior guru within Iskcon at the time, and on how things should infact proceed.
  • This was a necessary ingredient for me, so i received from him seed details which grew on further study within the gaudiya matha line into what i accept is an internal preaching mood for those who cap in hand research within their precincts of knowledge which i did over several years and numerous devotees later.The practical results are to be found within the personal moods of certain readings within the gaudiya math ,but in short i can help simply at another time....your servant Sri_govinda_das
  • sri_govinda_das:
    He was definitely saying it was a siksa line and not diksa,consequently several realisations had manifested along with new information and had given him increased vision and encouragment.Especially since he was a senior guru within Iskcon at the time, and on how things should infact proceed.
    I know well how TKG can reply on a question, and what happens if you do not agree with his point of view;-) since my personal experience was that it is better not to do it...[br][br] However while it is siksa line, we do have a bona fide diksa line as well, nodoby rejected anyone and there is no need to reject a devotee who gave you the holy name. In the same way we accept that Lord Caitanyas guru (diksa) is Isvara Puri, even if he got sannyas or brahmana thread somewhere else.
  • ccd is not Mataji! His 'spiritual body' is male this incarnation .
  • I think he just wants to put down our diksa-line because it is leading to Jahnava-mata:-)
  • My dear ccd,if your knowledge is superior to mine please tell me where viphina bihari goswami appears in your diksa conception of our sampradaya? Previous to our iskcon movement within the gaudiya matha as a whole ,whose individual opinion shaped the ''guru siddhanta'' ....previous to ac bhaktivedanta swami Prabhupada.?Who was the diksa guru of gaurakisore das babaji?Why does he not appear in a prominent position ,if it is infact a diksa line?....I could go on and on but i think the important piont will be made.
  • Also do you really think that all knowledge of krishna conciousness is limited by what is written in the books which you and i have at our disposal?Does iskcon have a similair opportunity to differentiate between the devotional line and the so called diksa component as you seem intent on,as happens in the gaudiya matha? ?How about the silver spoons which our srila Prabhupada gave to a wonderful sanyasis ,who then gave them to a householder ?Who himself became extremely empowered?Became a sanyasis and is now even more devotional, and even his diksa disciple knows the unique spiritual mood or rasa which is not confined to your diksa rasa?In other words ,like the catholics of old can there infact be internal knowledge not for everyone consumption which is essential for the advancment and spiritual nourishment.?How about the tiger hat which was given to srila Bhatisiddhanta saraswati Prabhupada by gaurakisore das babaji?Where does this fit within our understandings of diksa?....your servant sri_govinda das
  • sri_govinda_das:
    My dear ccd,if your knowledge is superior to mine???? please tell me where viphina bihari goswami appears in your diksa conception of our sampradaya?
    Actually he does not appear in the diksa line leading to Gaura-kisora dasa Babaji. Gaurakisora received mantra diksa from Nanda Kisora Gosvami of Santipura (author fo Sri-Gaura-premollasa-stotram). He accepted babaji vesa from Bhagavata Das Babaji one of the main disciples of Siddhakrishnadasa Babaji. The fact that harinama diksa is in the line of Jahnavi Thakurani. (However some argued that Gaura-kisora das Babaji Maharaja belonged to Advaita-parivara.) No diksa line is not prominent, we don't even give it in books but if someone asks we will say it is line leading to Jahnavi Mata, but it is a bona-fide line [-I am just quoting here Gopiparanadhana Prabhu]. See also http://www.chakra.org/discussions/BMMay11_06.html
    [br][br] Sorry I got lost on your last post, are you saying you know something but it is not in the books and you do not want to share it? Or is it that TKG knew something and did not share it with us, I guess it is just a language gap. There is no such a thing as guru-siddhanta, for example (unless you are a ritvik;-)... If you want to read a bit on diksa guru line previous to ISKCON (and after BSST) maybe worth reading GBC correspondence at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/18502294/Ananta-Vasudeva [br][br]

    Can you start a separate question about the tiger hat? That sounds very interesting...
  • My dear ccd,you have infact missed the substance of this siksa line ,viphin bihari goswami appears in our line as the diksa guru of sac did annanda bhaktivinoda thakur.At the time srila bhaktivinoda tahkur was at a loss to find a competent vaisnava who was actually inclined to preach.Due to the low ebb of the vaisnava culture within Bengal at the time ,smarta brahmana and sahaja's of all description had brought about the situation where by bhakti -devotional service to sri krishna was seen as a sad begging profession.Sri chaitanya mahaprabhu appeared within a dream ,and told srila Bhaktivinoda thakur to seek initiation from viphin bihari goswami......which he did ,much to the disgust of his son ......the future srila bhaktisiddanta saraswati goswami.
  • This diksa of his farther' was seen by bimala prasad ...srila bhaktisiddanta saraswati as a decorum's sake move,to fullfill what was perceived to be the necessary mandatory procedure at the time by Srila bhaktivinoda himself .That the parampara of srila Bhaktisiddanta saraswati swami was drawn from Jaganatha das babaji and Bhaktivinoda takura and not viphin bihari goswami.As there had been considerable offense taken at the mundane attitude viphina bihari goswami displayed in criticising srila Raghunatha das goswami ......typical of caste brahmana's who sought to identify him as coming from a low born caste.His dispute that the birth place of sri chaitanya mahaprabhu was in fact not where bhaktivinoda takur had determined it to be,and had infact rejected him as his disciple as a consequence.
    Srila bhaktisiddanta reinitiated a leading disciple of viphin bihari goswami which in essence shows severe disgust and disregard that he was in fact guru of bhaktivinoda.Determined to defeat the false conclusions of Viphina bihari goswami,Bhaktisiddanta saraswati defeated him at a debate at midnpur on brahmans and vaisnava's.
    Generally within our line, post srila bhaktisiddanta there seems to be a perception of a dominant siksa parampara ,this understanding is usually also seen as a'' bhagavat parampara'' by those who follow his mood .Some disagree but there followers received initiation from srila bhaktisiddanta's brother...Lalita prasad..Whose mood was vastly different and was not attempting to become situated as a preacher hence is deemed secondary at best by those in iskcon.
  • Within iskcon my new friend ccd, we are developing our unique ''guru siddanta'', guru truths or conclusions.We used to worship the guru's within the temple rooms with their own vyasasans as the supreme personality of godheads representatives.....but that is no longer.Hence it is my opinion that Iskcon is in a state of flux to a certain degree on how to proceed.....You are right about the diksa guru of gaurakisore das babaji maharaja......but i will finish tomorrow ,just came home from temple..your servant and hopefully new friend sri govinda das
  • sri_govinda_das:
    My dear ccd,you have infact missed the substance of this siksa line ,viphin bihari goswami appears in our line as the diksa guru of sac did annanda bhaktivinoda thakur.
    Sure he gave diksa to BVT, but he DOES NOT belong to the diksa line we have, so there is no rejection of anyone in our line. There is no diksa link between BVT and Srila Gaurakisora dasa Babaji (obviously since BTV took babaji vesa from SKdB). Moreover for some reason BSST would never write anything to the effect that you have stated, so he did not put any 'perceived' offence in the paper, obviously we would do the same would we? Bipina vihari Goswami (a family man) did support BVT in his excavation and location of the birthplace of Mahaprabhu (he unfortunately later withdrew this support and thus was in conflict with BSST). I do not think that you read the links above, you just shoot it without doing much research, so just to repeat, BSST;s diksa guru is Srila Gaurakisora, as BSST himself stated; therefore it is his diksa line that is our diksa line.
  • sri_govinda_das:
    Within iskcon my new friend ccd, we are developing our unique ''guru siddanta''

    I trully hope we do not, we usually try to follow the siddhanta, and if we do not we develop something "new". So I beg to disagree with you. [br][br]
    Prabhupada wasn't impressed, and complained about our propensity to always change things. "They manufacture ideas and spend money. This is the difficulty. Everyone manufactures some idea. And break it, do it, dig it." he told us a story. "There was a Mohammedan king, Nizamuddin. Nizamuddin, there is a tomb in Delhi. He was poet. So if some friends come he would read some writing, and he will suggest, the friend will suggest, 'Why don't you make like this.'
    "'Oh, it is good. All right.' He'll do it. Whatever he says. And when he goes away, then again makes his own.[br][br]
    "So the secretary said, 'Why you are changing?'[br][br]
    "'What can I do? That is my friend. And that is nonsense; therefore I am again doing what I wrote.'[br][br]
    "So we have to do that. As soon as you call anybody, he'll give you some suggestion. 'Make this alteration, make this alteration.'"[br][br]
    after telling this story Prabhupada shook his head with good-humored resignation.[br][br][br][br]

    While i understand that acarya is one who "cannot be expected to conform to a stereotype, for he must find the ways and means by which Krsna consciousness may be spread". Siddhanta or (determination of the actual truth, the final conclusion, by quotation from Vedic scriptures) in relation to guru-tattva is not something you can manufacture (unless you are a ritivik or something...) We do not manufacture our own teachings. So-called scholars and learned men manufacture their own teachings and give their opinions. In the West especially, we find much philosophical speculation and mental gymnastics, but such philosophy can never be perfect. We have to take our ideas from Bhagavan; then they will be perfect. We read Bhagavad-gita because it is perfect. There is no mistake in it; there is no illusion in it; there is no cheating in it. Nor is it delivered by one whose senses are imperfect. "This supreme science was thus received through the chain of disciplic succession, and the saintly kings understood it in that way." This Krsna consciousness philosophy is very easy because we do not manufacture ideas. We take the ideas and the words delivered by the Supreme Person, Krsna, or His incarnation or representative. His representative does not say anything which Krsna Himself does not say. It is very easy to be a representative, but one cannot be a representative of Krsna if one tries to interpret Krsna's words in a whimsical way.[br][br]
    Because how you can manufacture perfect knowledge? You are imperfect. Your senses are imperfect. You are defective in four ways. You are... To err is human. You must commit mistake. You must be illusioned. Your senses are imperfect, and you have got a cheating propensity. These four defects are there.
  • He has stated, “The Arcarya’s words are to be used as supporting material and not as the sole basis of for an argument.” This is not always the case. The acarya’s words can stand on their own, due to their spiritual advancement. Bhaktivinoda Thakur has some good quotes from Sri Tattra Sutram. He states:

    "Spiritual ordinances are intended for the regulation of the ignorant human beings whereas those who are endowed with discretion and divine wisdom are not controlled by them…since knowledge itself is the root of the scriptures the one who has attained that self-evident knowledge will not be ruled by the scriptures, but they guide him with advices. In case of ignorant people, this is not so. They must be governed by the rules of the scriptures for their upliftment…

    Devotees of the supreme Lord are not controlled by the scriptures since their activities are congenial to the divine wisdom…Therefore, when the self realized devotees ordain any new arrangement, they should be agreed with as a religious code, even if such new arrangements are not found in the spiritual dictums of the previous sages." (191-204)


    THIS IS THE ASCENDENCY!


    Hari!
  • My dear ccd,you seem intent on placing your head within the sand.....like an osterich when you find something does infact not suit your pleasant perception of krishna conciousness.Vipin bihari goswami was a diksa guru within our line but srila Bhaktididanta saraswati refused to accept his farther ,who was a'' Vaisnava ''needed any guidance or nourishment from someone who was intent on being offensive to sri raganatha das goswami.
    Whom srila bhaktisiddanta had a very strong attachment for......he many times calls out for his blessings within his personal writings.Hence he rejected this'' caste goswami''because of his mixed alloyed devotional standards.Due to the nature of our parampara line he is indeed seen in a unusual light hence forth.Yes my ''nrisingha we are meant to be intent on pleasing our previous archarya's and spiritual masters by tuning our intelligence to their mood and perception of their vision.The '' unique'' mood of guru siddhanta which is being illustrated here by his divine grace srila Bhaktisiddanta saraswati goswami maharaja should infact be a guiding light for those intelligent enough to ascertain the more pleasing ,more perfect way forward in my humble view....your servant govinda das.
  • sri_govinda_das:
    My dear ccd,you seem intent on placing your head within the sand.....like an osterich when you find something does infact not suit your pleasant perception of krishna conciousness.
    Now you are really annoying me with you semi-illiterate off the wall comments. Before one write something one should at least learn to read.

    sri_govinda_das:
    Vipin bihari goswami was a diksa guru within our line but srila Bhaktididanta saraswati refused to accept his farther.
    No he is not in 'our line' unless you were initiated by lalita prasada. Our line means line of BSST. Are you suggesting that BSST got diksa from Bhaktivinoda Thakura?

    sri_govinda_das:
    who was intent on being offensive to sri raganatha das goswami.
    Whom srila bhaktisiddanta had a very strong attachment for......he many times calls out for his blessings within his personal writings.Hence he rejected this'' caste goswami'' because of his mixed alloyed devotional standards.
    I will not even respond to this rubbish. You are accusing BSST of something that is non-factual here-say of some rumors. Even if he 'rejected' him, there is absolutely no problem, since he is not his initiating guru, nor is BSST initiated by him or anyone who was initiated by him, he is just a diksa guru of his father. BTW why are you so hung up on him, there is a dozen of initiating gurus who gave diksa to individual acharyas, such as Visvanatha Cakravarti, Krisnadasa Kaviraja etc., who are not listed on the bhagavat parampara line published by BSST? Not that he rejected them all, it is just that he listed only acharyas, not regular gurus. Who do you think gave initiation to Vishvanatha Cakravarti? Who gave initiation to Jagannatha dasa Babaji - do you think he was instructed or initiated by Visvanatha Cakravarti? Do you think that Narottama was a siksa disciple of Krisnadasa Kaviraja? Do you think BSST rejected diksa guru of Krisnadasa Kaviraja Goswami and if yes who it was? Get your story straight and stop your patronizing demeanor. You ether answer the question or get off the pot.
  • So why ccd has iskcon changed how we worship our guru's within the temples?When i jioned Iskcon thirty odd years ago we had all the guru's on their own vyasasans within the temple itself......Now they no longer allow this.Because of guru fall downs and in my opinion ''god -brother immaturity''.It was an extremely wonderful experience to perform ecstatic guru puja worship to your own guru personally immediately after srila Prabhupada's guru puja.This was the accepted standard within our gaudiya line ......and within Iskcon till recently.Obviously the GBC changed things in their wisdom,but eventually i would hope things mature to a degree to once again return to the more genuine siddhanta....guru siddhanta.Personally now myself i have to learn how to see the ''good'' with the many senior godbrothers and vaisnava's within the gaudiya line.Because of my lack of purity i also suffer this disease of ''envy'' which inhibts my ability to serve and be governed by guru's mood and desire to preach.
  • sri_govinda_das:
    So why ccd has iskcon changed how we worship our guru's within the temples?When i jioned Iskcon thirty odd years ago we had all the guru's on their own vyasasans within the temple itself......Now they no longer allow this.Because of guru fall downs and in my opinion ''god -brother immaturity''.
    The reality is that there were no gurus, there were acharyas who immitated every thing that Prabhupada did, including daily guru-puja, morning walks and even more, doing it in front of their godbrothers. As far as I am concerned, they are all good devotees, but not getting to the platform of 'acharyas'. The system we have now is still a bit too high for a standard system of worship of a guru in Gaudiya Vaisnavism, normally GV guru is offered puja only once a year and does not have an individual pranam mantra, these are all still remnants of what Ananta vasudeva in 1930s set up as part of the Acharya worship (he even wrote the nama-on visnu padaya mantra that we use) and it is being carried out by Gaudiya Maths acharyas and early gurus in ISKCON. In reality the only acharya after BSST is Srila Prabhupada. All others are regular gurus, and we are happy to see the standard coming down to what is the accepted norm in Gaudiya Vaisnavism. GBC is constantly changing things, I would not call it 'their wisdom', but we pray it is and we are all behind them... Daily guru puja, singing of the pranam mantra, taking worship from god-brothers, and getting toilets made of solid gold is NOT and never was an accepted standard, just and imitation of the founder acharya; btw they are all good devotees, not without problems, but on average nice souls, handpicked by Prabhupada.
  • Your perception of diksa.....is your problem,not what is accepted within iskcon, by those uniquely empowered......but this is about their individual devotional mood or unique rasa which enables them to do the sublime.Such as indradumya maharaja ,beacuse he received the mercy of his senior godbrother vishnujana maharaja and the Radha -damodara bus devotee's mercy.....that is why i told you the story of the silver spoons which were handed down from our srila Prabhupada .....unless your guru is familiar or indeed empowered he will fail to possibly appreciate this unique iskcon rasa of impowerment....sorry to upset your comfitable perceptions of things.But my siksa guru pased on his extremely valuable guru understandings to myself and in that mood i tried to offer it to you.However it is not appreciated by you....so please accept my humble obeisances all glories to guru and gauranga....But your book knowledge though adequate for you is indeed lacking and is unable to fully empower those who are truly sincere......hare krishna.
  • Sampradaya of spoons? I am proud that I do not belong to it:-)
  • These humble guru's ,great souls were able to achieve far greater preaching results than previously was established within iskcon or the preaching environment.Actually these guru have fashioned a society far greater than was around when even srila Prabhupada was personally present.....that was indeed their contribution to their guru.My siksa guru Tamala krishna goswami was the senior most follower of srila Prabhupada in my veiw......Personally the gurupuja worship was initiated by our Founder Archarya within Iskcon...not any gaudiya matha guru ....once again you have seen srila Prabhupada's vision as suspect.....solid gold toilets are very dangerous for those who are still intent on finding fault or are immature.
    As to how a disciple following srila Prabhupada attemps to please sincerely that is up to the individual.As my friend guru kripa das,a huge sankirtan collector from the seventies.....guru kripa goswami told us that he would not have cared if srila Prabhupada had washed the hundreds of thousands of dollars he collected down the toilets.It was up to him.
  • I have no doubt that you see your guru as the senior most follower of Prabhupada. If you think that Prabhupada invented guru-puja, you need to go back to school... But hey we all love Prabhupada that is the bottom line and is the real unity of the ranks.
  • No you are not part of the Radha -damodara legacy ccd,nor the vishnujana swami-tamala krishna krishna goswami legacy nor are you a part of the iskcon which was empowered by srila Prabhupada sweetly gifting those silver spoons to radha and Damodara.But hopefully krishna might allow you to one day wash away your sad devotional inabilities and blissfully allow you within this transcendental sublime movement. Where your impersonalism is permanently vanquished and everything is truly sweet and satisfying,where devotees are enthusiastic beleiving that iskcon will save the world in that last moments .... .hare krishna.....we are not a mundane institution bereft of transcendental nectar prabhu........Some of us especially from the early days are not posessing this mundane vision of the guru.We are not crippled by this kripana mentality....hare krishna may Radha -damodara one day please allow you within.
  • I keep getting entertained by "within" "inside" "in" concepts. It is clearly a form of immature fanatic religious (christian?) self defense, like "I have accepted Jesus, have you? type.
    ¿Who is "in"?¿Who decides? ¿Your local priest?
  • ---------- Forwarded Message ----------

    Text PAMHO:16675543 (60 lines)
    From: Bhakti Visrambha Madhava Swami
    Date: 21-Dec-08 06:20 -0500 (22:20 +1100)
    To: BDC (Book Distribution Curriculum) [427]
    To: BDN (Book Distribution Nectar) [2808]
    Subject: old sp story..
    ------------------------------------------------------------

    Now it is the end of the marathon, and you must be exhausted. Please note
    that My realizations (being that I am a pujari-cook by nature) of book
    distribution is: you can only enthusiastically distribute the book that you
    personally love. Unless that book has changed your life personally, You will
    not be able to continue to change other peoples lives with that book for
    very long time. some devotees distribute for a few years, but because they
    only sell and don't read, they cannot continue it.

    Srila Prabhupada in 1976 told us members of Radha Damodara TSKP in Mayapur
    during His darshana the same:

    "so You are distributing the books but do you read them also?" Prabhupada
    asked us upon entering his room.

    "Oh yes srila Prabhupada!" our sannyasi leader Tamal Krsna Maharaja
    (confidentally white lied!_he knew we'ld not dare speak out and challenge
    our sannyasi leader verbally.

    yet we gave him such an incredulous look, all of us 80 boys..
    it was obvious, Tamala Krsna Maharaja who was well intentionally trying to
    hide the fact, was not truthfully forthcoming on it.

    when 80--90 boys all young say 18-20 years old. all Heard that, it was like
    we all crained our necks and looked at Tamal Krsna maharaja with shocking
    surprise,, like silently speaking "You said what???"

    Srila Prabhupada was smart, clever, he could clearly understand that Tamal
    Krsna Maharaja was hiding the real truth, (due to intense competition from
    Jayatirtha in London and elsewhere).

    Srila Prabhupada was Indignant with Anger...

    "So you are distributing the books, and suppose you come up to me and you
    give me a book. and I ask you, "You are selling me this book but do you know
    what is written inside this book," what will you reply to him.

    He wanted a reply directly from us, we got scared and kept our mouth shut.

    "what will you say!!!" he demanded. Ohhh we got really scared and we didn't
    reply.

    Srila Prabhupada's heart got soft. he didn't want to intimidate or scare his
    surrendered disciples, just wanted to instruct us... "nooooooooo (like the
    father he is) "You must readddddd!!!

    then we all hung our heads downwards. reading was like sense gratification
    for us, we read only when there was no one to sell books to, or when wew
    slinkered down in between two cars to hide, if the police were looking to
    catch us in shopping centres.

    reading? only van leaders amongst us were reading! we were selling books 9
    am to p pm who's got time to read?

    yet those very van leaders were the most steadfast ones' who never left
    Iskcon, not like the ones who don't read the books.

    yours in the service of Krsna BalarAma,

    TridaNDi BhikSu, Bhakti Visrambha MAdhava
    (Text PAMHO:16675543) --------------------------------------

    ------- End of Forwarded Message ------
  • Jaya Srila Prabhupada! Reading ki jaya!!
  • Dear mishra prabhu, krishna decides ....you usually are no longer around,or you are inimical and sadly no longer progress.But the nourishment resides and you become faithless ,callous and attack senior devotees like the inhabitants of ''sun sampradaya editorial staff''.
  • Hello... anybody there... Haribol.... Haribooool.... Please remove silver spoons and read again the question about sampradaya... it is not sampradaya sin that we are talking about... Anyone there....
  • My dear ccd, at least you could indeed fathom the perferted reflection of srila Prabhupada's silver spoons and the simple sweet loving affairs which was shared between him and vishnujana swami.well done prabhu....isn't it a sweet sampradaya rasa .Don't worry prabhu i am going to pray for your future advancement.
  • In 1985 TKG came to Singapore. Many devotees were literally forced to take initiation and reinitiation from him.

    Vrindavan Das (disciple of TKG initiated 1986):

    "I had just got over the hangover of Hansadutta, and TKG forced me and my family to take initiation from him. From the very start, his behaviour was duplicitous."

    Krishnakatha Das (disciple of TKG initiated 1986) :

    "Someone may say that these forced initiations were his mercy, but I think it was sheer foolishness. TKG was ordering everyone like a Hitler and I was disappointed that he was treating our Temple President like his disciple."

    Pralad Das (disciple of TKG initiated 1986) :

    "I felt very uncomfortable with him and in my heart I did not feel anything for him.. I was always bemused how Giridhari Das (at that time, now Swami) was taking TKG's chastisement like a disciple. I did not feel that this was how TKG should treat a Godbrother."

    Citraketu Das (disciple of TKG initiated 1990):

    "We found him a very strange person who was always artificially trying to praise someone whenever he wanted something from him or her. His desire for extremely opulent food was unbecoming of someone in the renounced order."

    http://www.vnn.org/world/WD9809/WD17-2238.html
  • As for Visnujana (ex-swami) Perhaps he did commit suicide, but the factual details of this account were doctored up? I vaguely remember that we were told that Srila Prabhupada had said that "Vishnujana is hiding." I can't remember the timeline on this, whether he said this before or after he said "He should not have done this."
  • I do remember in the late '80s, though, that someone was said to have spotted him at the Govinda's Restaurant in the North Park area of San Diego. I don't remember who made that claim, and it was certainly never confirmed.
  • Thank you borokrishna das,for the opportunity to hear from some old freinds like lohitaksa prabhu.He jioned up just after myself ,in murwillambah if i remember correctly and his ex-wife kamodaki devi dasi is serving in Auckland..new Zealand.It is sad such devotees are not mature enough to take responsibility for their own devotional activities,however all is not lost.Could the devotees in question please outline how they were forced by his grace tamala krishna goswami......did the authorities hold a gun to their heads!Beat them up !,Pioson or just ask them nicely in a dramatically dangerous manner.Or realising they were unable for what ever reason to appreciate their new guru's mood ,just be humble and admit they made a substantial mistake themselves.
    Since his divine grace tamala krishna goswami has left to serve srila Prabhupada according to his will and desire,these devotees are hopefully able to spoon feed themselves krishns conciousness.If they have taken shelter of the sastra they can understand that we are in need also of siksa guru to give us shelter.Especially since this is considered a bhagavat parampara,or predominantly siksa inspired line according to his divine grace Srila Bhaktisiddanta swami.
  • According to their realisation,these immature devotees were unfortunately unable to appreciate srila Tamala krishna's goswami's position,unlike giriraja das,who later became giriraja swami who humbly submitted as behooves a sincere sadhaka.Symptomatic of progressive devotees who appreciate how another godbrother is significantly more empowered in pleasing there guru.Great source for such discussion also a know anti iskcon website......vnn world great uttama's like narayanna maharaja come from such environments......until they blaspheme our srila Ac BHACKTIVEDANTA SWAMI Prabhupada.
  • Yes, it seems Visnujana Swami could not appreciate TKG... but we like them all. I was told TKG had changed a lot in his last years in UK. I was told a lot of very good things about him at that stage.
  • Srila Prabhupada personally instructed vishnujana swami how a sanyasis should indeed rectify his fall down , which he carried out to the satisfaction of srila PRABHUPADA.....end of story...this is another krishna silver spoon rasa ccd.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion