VEDA:
It's true that from the pov of acceptance Krsna as Bhagavan GV sampradaya is closer to Vallabha and Nimbarka.
More about Madhva-GV affiliation: http://www.iskcon.com/icj/11/04-gupta.html
But Vallabha sampradaya appeared later, Rudra sampradaya at the time did not have Vallabha and only later when Vallabha was established invited him to take up the chair of the acharya of Rudra sampradaya. But that was later.
The above my link is a review of the link you posted;-)
Srila bhaktisiddanta saraswati Prabhupada refused to accept several of the diksa guru's within our sampradaya even though they initiated formally members.sri_govinda_das:
Also if one was to inquirer into the unique history of gaurakisore das babaji,one might be surprised to find that his guru was one bhagavat das babajisri_govinda_das:
My dear ccd ,have you heard who the diksa guru of srila bhaktivinoda thakura was?Sri chaitanya mahaprabhu appeared in a dream and informed sat cid annada bhaktivinoda to him as his diksa guru.sri_govinda_das:
I know well how TKG can reply on a question, and what happens if you do not agree with his point of view;-) since my personal experience was that it is better not to do it...[br][br] However while it is siksa line, we do have a bona fide diksa line as well, nodoby rejected anyone and there is no need to reject a devotee who gave you the holy name. In the same way we accept that Lord Caitanyas guru (diksa) is Isvara Puri, even if he got sannyas or brahmana thread somewhere else.He was definitely saying it was a siksa line and not diksa,consequently several realisations had manifested along with new information and had given him increased vision and encouragment.Especially since he was a senior guru within Iskcon at the time, and on how things should infact proceed.sri_govinda_das:
Actually he does not appear in the diksa line leading to Gaura-kisora dasa Babaji. Gaurakisora received mantra diksa from Nanda Kisora Gosvami of Santipura (author fo Sri-Gaura-premollasa-stotram). He accepted babaji vesa from Bhagavata Das Babaji one of the main disciples of Siddhakrishnadasa Babaji. The fact that harinama diksa is in the line of Jahnavi Thakurani. (However some argued that Gaura-kisora das Babaji Maharaja belonged to Advaita-parivara.) No diksa line is not prominent, we don't even give it in books but if someone asks we will say it is line leading to Jahnavi Mata, but it is a bona-fide line [-I am just quoting here Gopiparanadhana Prabhu]. See also http://www.chakra.org/discussions/BMMay11_06.htmlMy dear ccd,if your knowledge is superior to mine???? please tell me where viphina bihari goswami appears in your diksa conception of our sampradaya?sri_govinda_das:
Sure he gave diksa to BVT, but he DOES NOT belong to the diksa line we have, so there is no rejection of anyone in our line. There is no diksa link between BVT and Srila Gaurakisora dasa Babaji (obviously since BTV took babaji vesa from SKdB). Moreover for some reason BSST would never write anything to the effect that you have stated, so he did not put any 'perceived' offence in the paper, obviously we would do the same would we? Bipina vihari Goswami (a family man) did support BVT in his excavation and location of the birthplace of Mahaprabhu (he unfortunately later withdrew this support and thus was in conflict with BSST). I do not think that you read the links above, you just shoot it without doing much research, so just to repeat, BSST;s diksa guru is Srila Gaurakisora, as BSST himself stated; therefore it is his diksa line that is our diksa line.My dear ccd,you have infact missed the substance of this siksa line ,viphin bihari goswami appears in our line as the diksa guru of sac did annanda bhaktivinoda thakur.sri_govinda_das:
Within iskcon my new friend ccd, we are developing our unique ''guru siddanta''sri_govinda_das:
Now you are really annoying me with you semi-illiterate off the wall comments. Before one write something one should at least learn to read.My dear ccd,you seem intent on placing your head within the sand.....like an osterich when you find something does infact not suit your pleasant perception of krishna conciousness.sri_govinda_das:
No he is not in 'our line' unless you were initiated by lalita prasada. Our line means line of BSST. Are you suggesting that BSST got diksa from Bhaktivinoda Thakura?Vipin bihari goswami was a diksa guru within our line but srila Bhaktididanta saraswati refused to accept his farther.sri_govinda_das:
I will not even respond to this rubbish. You are accusing BSST of something that is non-factual here-say of some rumors. Even if he 'rejected' him, there is absolutely no problem, since he is not his initiating guru, nor is BSST initiated by him or anyone who was initiated by him, he is just a diksa guru of his father. BTW why are you so hung up on him, there is a dozen of initiating gurus who gave diksa to individual acharyas, such as Visvanatha Cakravarti, Krisnadasa Kaviraja etc., who are not listed on the bhagavat parampara line published by BSST? Not that he rejected them all, it is just that he listed only acharyas, not regular gurus. Who do you think gave initiation to Vishvanatha Cakravarti? Who gave initiation to Jagannatha dasa Babaji - do you think he was instructed or initiated by Visvanatha Cakravarti? Do you think that Narottama was a siksa disciple of Krisnadasa Kaviraja? Do you think BSST rejected diksa guru of Krisnadasa Kaviraja Goswami and if yes who it was? Get your story straight and stop your patronizing demeanor. You ether answer the question or get off the pot.who was intent on being offensive to sri raganatha das goswami.sri_govinda_das:
Whom srila bhaktisiddanta had a very strong attachment for......he many times calls out for his blessings within his personal writings.Hence he rejected this'' caste goswami'' because of his mixed alloyed devotional standards.
The reality is that there were no gurus, there were acharyas who immitated every thing that Prabhupada did, including daily guru-puja, morning walks and even more, doing it in front of their godbrothers. As far as I am concerned, they are all good devotees, but not getting to the platform of 'acharyas'. The system we have now is still a bit too high for a standard system of worship of a guru in Gaudiya Vaisnavism, normally GV guru is offered puja only once a year and does not have an individual pranam mantra, these are all still remnants of what Ananta vasudeva in 1930s set up as part of the Acharya worship (he even wrote the nama-on visnu padaya mantra that we use) and it is being carried out by Gaudiya Maths acharyas and early gurus in ISKCON. In reality the only acharya after BSST is Srila Prabhupada. All others are regular gurus, and we are happy to see the standard coming down to what is the accepted norm in Gaudiya Vaisnavism. GBC is constantly changing things, I would not call it 'their wisdom', but we pray it is and we are all behind them... Daily guru puja, singing of the pranam mantra, taking worship from god-brothers, and getting toilets made of solid gold is NOT and never was an accepted standard, just and imitation of the founder acharya; btw they are all good devotees, not without problems, but on average nice souls, handpicked by Prabhupada.So why ccd has iskcon changed how we worship our guru's within the temples?When i jioned Iskcon thirty odd years ago we had all the guru's on their own vyasasans within the temple itself......Now they no longer allow this.Because of guru fall downs and in my opinion ''god -brother immaturity''.sri_govinda_das:
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!