portnoy:Kula Pavana Prabhu -- did you ever spend any time in New Vrindaban? Just curious .. and by the way -- I'm sorry for anything insulting I said to you on this forum.Yes, I have spent two days there in the late 1980's. I could not wait to get out of that place. I was invited there by Devamrita swami and got a VIP tour including private 'darshan' with K-swami. I felt sorry for all the sincere devotees stuck there but I kept my mouth shut. One scene in particular stands out in my mind: K-swami standing with his attack dog inches away from the Deities in the temple, complete with jogi-Jesus. I thought: these people are brainwashed out of their friggin minds to accept this phoney baloney 'successor to Prabhupada'... ------------------------ Prabhu, you have not offended me at all. No apologies needed. You are a serious, sincere devotee who tries to preserve the legacy of Srila Prabhupada the best you can. My dandavat pranams to all such souls...
'Bhaktivedanta' was a title, not a diksa name.It seems to be implied that name Bhaktivedanta was given to Srila Prabhupada at the sannyasa ceremony. It is not true. He was the first to have this name and Narayana Maharaja is wrong to suggest that he got it first. Here is the quote from Gaudya Partika on the Jansi opening: The editor of the local Theosophical Society, Sri Laksminarayan Rajapali, was also present; although he holds different philosophical opinions from Bhaktivedanta Prabhu, he is very sympathetic with this movement. Prabhupada was holding this name since 1947, when Narayana Maharaja was not even practicing. He specifically said it was a name, not a title, "bhaktivedanta" nam ebe sarthak kor.
sri_govinda_das:Sorry Kula- pavanna we are iskconites.....life after life we will follow srila Bhaktivedanta swami Prabhupada and his preaching mission and flavour....not some pretender who attempts to twist our guru's legacy and then trys to usurp his position........This is the way you see it, but others see it differently, and it is their choice. If I were to chose between NM and Radhanatha M. for example, I would choose NM without a moment's hesitation. All those 'guru wars' only discourage new people from taking up Mahaprabhu's mission seriously. From all of the 700 verses in Gita only a handfull speak about the guru - less than 1% - the rest is about Krsna and the process of reaching Him. But in Iskcon it is almost the other way - it is all about guru. No wonder so many people see us as a cult.